期刊文献+

腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的疗效比较研究 被引量:5

Comparative study of the efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy and laparotomy
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的对比分析腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的疗效。方法选取96行阑尾切除术的患者,其中分为研究组(腹腔镜手术)48例和对照组48例(开腹手术)。比较两组患者的手术效果,并进行统计学分析。结果两组患者均顺利完成手术,无休克、死亡病例发生。研究组无一例中转开腹。研究组的手术时间明显缩短,术中出血量明显减少,术后使用抗生素的时间明显短于对照组,且术后并发症少,术后住院时间明显短于对照组,两组上述指标分别比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论腹腔镜阑尾切除术具有创伤小、出血少、住院时间短、并发症少等优点,明显优于开腹手术,值得推广和应用。 Objective To compare and analyze he efficacy of laparoscopic appendectomy and laparotomy. Methods 96 appendectomy patients were divided into study group (laparoscopic surgery) 48 cases and the conlrol group (laparotomy) 48 cases. The operation effect were compared and statistically analyzed between two groups. Results All patients were successfully completed surgery, had no occurred shock, and deaths. Study group had no converted to laparotomy. The operation time of the study group was significantly shorter, blood loss, postoperative use of antibiotics of the observation was significantly shorter than the open group, and fewer post-operative complications, postoperative hospital stay was significantly shorter than the control group, these indicators were compared, the differences were significant differences(P 〈 0.05). Conclusion The laparoscopic appendectomy with trauma, less bleeding, shorter hospital stay, fewer complications, significantly better than open surgery, worthy of promotion and application.
作者 王先国
出处 《中国医药科学》 2013年第6期191-192,共2页 China Medicine And Pharmacy
关键词 阑尾切除术 腹腔镜 开腹手术 并发症 Appendectomy surgery Laparoscopic Laparotomy Complications
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献34

共引文献245

同被引文献32

  • 1戎祯祥,剧永乐,陈小伍,伍锦浩,朱达坚.穿孔性阑尾炎行腹腔镜与开腹手术的疗效对比分析[J].中国实用外科杂志,2004,24(9):560-561. 被引量:100
  • 2Kolovrat M,Lovri Z,Busi Z,et al. Laparoscopic versus open appendecto- my: our experience and literature review[J].Acta Med Croatica,2012,66 (5):383-385.
  • 3Gundavda MK, Bhandarwar AH. Comparative study of laparoscopic ver- sus open appendicectomy[J]. Indian J Med Sci,2012,66(5-6):99-115.
  • 4Mutter D,Marescaux J.Appendicitis/Divertieulitis: minimally invasive surgery[J].Dig Dis,2013,31(1):76-82.
  • 5Clarke T,Katkhouda N,Mason RJ,et al.Laparoscopic versus open appen- dectomy for the obese patient: a subset analysis from a prospective, ran- domized, double-blind study[J].Surg Endosc,2011,25(4):1276-1280.
  • 6Tsao KJ,St Peter SD,Valusek PA,et al.Adhesive small bowel obstruction after appendectomy in children: comparison between the laparoscopic and open approach[J]. J Pediatr Surg,2007,42(6):939-942.
  • 7Abu Shamsiia RN. Laparoscopic interventions in emergency abdominal surgery[J].Lik Sprava,2012(8):66-71.
  • 8兰明银,付应峰.肥胖病人行腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的疗效对比分析[J].腹部外科,2008,21(1):38-39. 被引量:17
  • 9张建凯,陈益军,吴晓波.腹腔镜阑尾切除术与开腹手术的疗效比较[J].医学临床研究,2008,25(5):905-906. 被引量:14
  • 10靳猛,王爱亮,刘志强,郭东立,姜飚.腹腔镜阑尾切除术150例报告[J].山东医药,2009,49(22):72-72. 被引量:5

引证文献5

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部