期刊文献+

再议儒家文化对一般信任的负效应——一项基于2007年中国居民调查数据的考察 被引量:56

Revisiting the Negative Effects of Confucian Culture on Generalized Trust:A study based on 2007 Chinese spiritual life survey
原文传递
导出
摘要 儒家文化必然会降低个体对于一般社会成员的信任程度吗?文化研究和基于国家间比较的经验研究都对这个问题给出了肯定的回答。然而,一些未尽议题的存在让我们在个人层面上对这一问题进行了重新审视。通过分析2007年的中国居民调查数据,我们得出以下结论:首先,儒家文化和一般信任之间的确存在某种联系,但这种联系取决于儒家文化中的某些特定的维度。当人们更多地重视儒家文化中强化差序格局的那些实践和主张时,我们发现儒家文化和一般信任之间存在负相关关系。但是如果人们将儒家文化看成是一种身份认同,那么中国人便因为共享着同一种价值观念而成为一个共同体,这时认同儒家文化的人就表现出了对他人的高度信任。此外,中介分析的结果表明,儒家文化中强化差序格局的面向和一般信任的负关系不是由儒家文化中过分强调对"自己人"的信任造成的。这意味着人们对"自己人"的信任与对"一般他人"的信任并没有直接关系。 Is the relationship between Confucian culture and generalized trust always negative? Cultural analysis and cross-society studies provide an affirmative answer. However,some unsolved issues encourage us to reexamine this research question on the individual level.By analyzing 2007 Chinese spiritual life survey data,the authors find;first,there is indeed certain relationship between Confucian culture and generalized trust,which,however,is contingent on the specific dimension of Confucian culture.If individuals emphasize Confucian teachings which enhance the differential mode of association,the relationship between Confucian culture and generalized trust is negative.However,if Confucian culture is treated as an identity,Chinese people would be more likely to constitute a community with the same value.In this case, Confucian culture is positively correlated with generalized trust.Besides,mediation test suggests that the negative correlation between Confucian culture enhancing the differential mode of association and generalized trust cannot be attributed to the specific trust in 'zijiren'(insiders),which means the trust in 'zijiren' and the trust in 'wairen'(outsiders) is not associated.This research corresponds to previous studies by Fukuyama and Redding,and our findings expand these classic studies.
作者 胡安宁 周怡
出处 《社会学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期28-54,242-243,共27页 Sociological Studies
基金 国家社科基金重大项目<现代社会信任模式与机制研究>(项目编号:11&ZD149)的阶段性成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献45

二级参考文献38

  • 1杨宜音.自我及其边界:文化价值取向角度的研究进展[J].国外社会科学,1998(6):25-29. 被引量:19
  • 2翟学伟.中国人际关系的特质——本土的概念及其模式[J].社会学研究,1993(4):74-83. 被引量:190
  • 3杨国枢 见杨国枢 余安邦主编.《中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点》[A].见杨国枢、余安邦主编.《中国人的心理与行为——观念及方法篇》[C].台北桂冠图书公司,1993年版..
  • 4孙隆基.《中国文化的深层结构》.桂林:广西师范大学出版社,2004年.第145-168,340-342页.
  • 5C.-Y.Chiu and Y.-Y. Hong, Social Psychology of Culture, New York: Psychology Press, 2006, pp. 14-46.
  • 6G. Hofstede, Culture's Consequences. International Differences in Work-Related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage, 1980.
  • 7H. C. Triandis, "Theoretical and Methodological Approaches to the Study of Collectivism and Individualism, " in U. Kim, H. C. Triandis, C. Kagitcibasi, S. C. Choi and G. Yoon, eds., Individualism and Collectivism: Theory, Method and Applications, Thousand Oakes: Sage Publications, 1994, pp. 41-65.
  • 8杨中芳.《中国人真的是“集体主义”的吗?--试论中国文化的价值体系》.杨国枢主编.《中国人的价值观--社会科学的观点》.台北:桂冠图书公司,1994年.
  • 9D. Oyserman, et al., “Rethinking Individualism and Collectivism: Evaluation of Theoretical Assumptions and Meta-Analyses, ” Psychological Bulletin, vol. 128, no. 1, 2002, pp. 3-72.
  • 10M. B. Brewer and Chen Y-R., "Where (Who) Are Collectives in Collectivism'? Toward Conceptual Clarification of Individualism and Collectivism," PsychologicalReview, vol. 114, no. 1, 2007, pp. 133-151.

共引文献419

同被引文献789

引证文献56

二级引证文献631

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部