3Fowler JR,Ilyas AM.The accuracy of digital radiographyin orthopaedic applications[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469(6):1781-1784.
4Samei E,Lo JY,Yoshizumi TT,et al.Comparative scatterand dose performance of slot-scan and full-field digitalchest radiography systems[J].Radiology,2005,235(3):940-949.
5Deschenes S,Charron G,Beaudoin G,et al.Diagnostic im-aging of spinal deformities:reducing patients radiationdose with a new slot-scanning X-ray imager[J],Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2010,35(9):989-994.
6Dietrich TJ,Pfirrmann CW,Schwab A,et al.Comparisonof radiation dose?workflow,patient comfort and financialbreak-even of standard digital radiography and a novel bi-planar low-dose X-ray system for upright full-length low-er limb and whole spine radiography[J].Skeletal Radiol,2013,42(7):959-967.
7Illes T,Tunyogi-Csapo M,Somoskey S.Breakthrough inthree-dimensional scoliosis diagnosis:significance of hori-zontal plane view and vertebra vectors[J].Eur Spine J,2011,20(1):135-143.
8Sutter R,Pfirrmann CW,Espinosa N,et al.Three-dimen-sional hindfoot alignment measurements based on biplanarradiographs:comparison with standard radiographicmeasurements[J].Skeletal Radiol,2013,42(4):493-498.
9Lee KH,Kwon JW,Yoon YC,et al.Slot-scan digital radi-ography of the lower extremities:a comparison to compu-ted radiography with respect to image quality and radia-tion dose[J],Korean J Radiol,2009,10(1):51-57.
10Gomez-Rice A,Nuez-Garcia A,Sdnchez-Mariscal F,et al.Relationship between clinical results and sagittal profilein adult scoliosis.Value of the spinal-sacral angle and thespinal inclination angle[J].Rev Esp Cir Ortop Trauma-tol,2012,56(6):426-431.
