摘要
目的比较巴德PICC和贝朗PICC不良事件发生率差异,分析原因,为减少PICC不良事件提供临床依据。方法对2010年6月14日—2011年11月26日期间的PICC患者置管与维护记录进行回顾性分析,统计巴德PICC和贝朗PICC不良事件发生情况。结果460例置管患者中共有105例患者发生导管相关不良事件,发生率为22.8%,巴德PICC堵塞和脱出率低于贝朗PICC,但是静脉炎和导管破损率高于贝朗PICC,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论巴德PICC和贝朗PICC各有优缺点,因此针对不同的导管采取更具针对性的护理措施,减少不良事件的发生,确保患者安全。
Objective To analyze the factors affecting the occurrence of PICC adverse event, and to provide scientific basis for reducing PICC adverse event rate. Methods Four hundred and sixty patients with PICC were retrospectively analyzed for their procedural parameters records and nursing records. Different adverse event occurrence between two types of PICC （from Bard Access System and Braun Sharing Expertise） were compared and the main factors affecting the adverse event occurrence were discussed. Results There were 105 cases of adverse events. Statistically significant difference was found in the adverse event occurrence of two different kinds of PICC. Occlusion and emerge rate of Bard PICC were lower than those of Braun PICC, but higher rate of phlebitis and catheter breakage of Bard PICC were found （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Both Bard PICC and Braun PICC had their advantages and disadvantages, specific nursing interventions should be conducted on the basis of different type of PICC.
出处
《护理学报》
2013年第5期16-18,共3页
Journal of Nursing（China）
基金
广东省科技厅社会发展面上项目(2012B031800402)
关键词
PICC
贝朗公司
巴德公司
不良事件
peripherally inserted central catheter （PICC）
Braun Sharing Expertise
Bard Access System
adverse event
