摘要
目的:采用AMSTAR量表对国内发表的慢性阻塞性肺疾病系统评价和荟萃分析进行方法学质量的评价。方法:电子检索中国期刊全文数据库、维普中文科技期刊数据库和万方医药期刊数据库中发表的以慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析为主题的文章,检索日期为1994年1月至2012年11月。按照国际上系统评价和荟萃分析进行方法学质量评价的工具—AMSTAR量表中的11个条目提取相关的资料。结果:经过初筛,排除重复及不符合纳入标准的文章,最终纳入33篇文献。根据AMSTAR中11个条目提取的结果显示,虽然96.97%的系统评价事前都制定了详细的设计方案,但仍有57.58%没有评估发表性偏倚,66.67%未说明相关的利益冲突。结论:国内发表的慢性阻塞性肺疾病的系统评价和荟萃分析的方法学质量有待于进一步提高,从事系统评价相关人员应加强培训。
Objective：To analyze and evaluate the methodological quality of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease system evaluation of the/Meta published AMSTAR scale. Methods：The evaluation system offMeta electronic searches of CNKI, VIP and WF database published in Chinese chronic obstructive pulmonary disease retrieval in January 1994 - November 2012. In accordance with the/Meta international system evaluation of methodological quality assessment tool-11 items scale AMSTAR to extract relevant data. Results：After screening, the repetitive and does not meet the inclusion criteria, a total of 33 papers were included. According to the extraction of 11 entries in AMSTAR results,although the 96.97% system evaluation prior to have formulated a detailed design, but there are still 57. 58% no assessment of pubhcation bias ,66.67% did not show relevant conflicts of interest. Conclusion ：The method of evaluation system of domestic/Meta published in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease study quality remains to be further improved, engaged in system evaluation related personnel should strengthen training.
出处
《中医学报》
CAS
2013年第3期327-329,共3页
Acta Chinese Medicine
基金
中医药行业科研专项项目实施方案(编号:201107002)
关键词
慢性阻塞性肺疾病
系统评价
荟萃分析
方法学
质量评价
chronic obstructive pulmonary disease
systematic review
Meta analysis
methodology
quality evaluation
