期刊文献+

数据包络分析SBM超效率模型无可行解问题的两阶段求解法 被引量:11

A Two-Stage Approach to Overcoming the Infeasibility of SBM Super-Efficiency Model in Data Envelopment Analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 数据包络分析是一种得到广泛应用的基于线性规划的非参数技术效率分析方法,其超效率模型是将被评价DMU从参照集中排除从而使求解得出的效率值可能大于1.超效率模型在文献中用于对有效的DMU进行排序、探测异常值、敏感性和稳定性分析、分析生产率变化的Malmquist模型、二人博弈模型等.超效率模型存在的一个缺陷是在规模收益可变的假设下会出现无可行解的问题.提出了一种基于两阶段求解的SBM超效率模型,并保持了与传统SBM超效率模型的兼容性:在传统的投入(产出)导向SBM超效率模型有可行解时,两阶段法获得的结果与之相同;在传统的投入(产出)导向SBM超效率模型无可行解时,两阶段超效率模型可以得出最接近投入(产出)导向定义的可行解.算例采用实际数据对方法进行了验证. Data envelopment analysis is a linear programming methodology for evaluating the relative technical efficiency for a set of peer decision making units. The super-efficiency model is identical to the standard model, except that the unit under evaluation is excluded from the reference set. The super-efficiency model has been used in ranking efficient units, identifying outliers, sensitivity and stability analysis, measuring productivity changes, and solving two-player games. However, under the assumption of variable returns to scale, the super-efficiency model may be infeasible for some efficient DMUs. We develop a 2-stage approach to overcoming this infeasibility issues, while keeping the compatibility with the traditional-oriented models. The newly developed model is illustrated with a real world dataset.
作者 钱振华 成刚
出处 《数学的实践与认识》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期171-178,共8页 Mathematics in Practice and Theory
基金 中国博士后科学基金(2012T50028)
关键词 数据包络分析 SBM模型 超效率 无可行解 两阶段 data envelopment analysis (DEA) slack based measure (SBM) super-efficiency infeasibility two stage
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Charnes A. Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and application [M]. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1994.
  • 2Seiford L M. Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978-1995) [J]. The Journal of Productivity Analysis, 1996, 6(7): 99-137.
  • 3Emrouznejad A, Parker B R, Tavares G. Evaluation of research in efficiency and productivity: A survey and analysis of the first 30 years of scholarly literature in DEA [J]. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 2008, 42(3): 151-157.
  • 4Charnes A, Cooper W W, Rhodes E. Measuring the efficiency of decision making units [J]. Eur J Oper Res, 1978, 2(6): 429-444.
  • 5Banker R D, Charnes A, Cooper W W. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis [J]. Manage Sci, 1984, 30(9): 1078-1092.
  • 6Farrell M J. The measurement of productive efficiency [J]. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General), 1957, 120(3): 253-290.
  • 7Coelli T J, Prasada Rao D S, O'Donnell C J, et al. Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis [M]. 2nd ed. New York: Springer Science-Business Media, 2005.
  • 8Cooper W W, Seiford L M, Tone K. Data envelopment analysis: a comprehensive text with models, applications, references and DEA-Solver software [M]. 2(nd ed). New York: Springer Science Business Media, 2007.
  • 9Tone K. A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis [J]. Eur J Oper Res, 2001, 130(3): 498-509.
  • 10Andersen P, Petersen N C. A procedure for ranking efficient units in data envelopment analysis [J]. Manage Sci, 1993, 39(10): 1261-1265.

同被引文献175

引证文献11

二级引证文献136

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部