期刊文献+

血清HE4检测在卵巢癌和子宫内膜癌诊断中的应用 被引量:3

The clinical value of serum HE4 in diagnosis of ovarian tumor and endometrial carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨血清人附睾蛋白4(HE4)和糖类抗原125(CA125)检测在卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌中的应用价值。方法:采用ELISA和化学发光微粒子免疫分析(CMIA)分别测定卵巢癌组、子宫内膜癌组、子宫肌瘤组和健康对照组的血清HE4和CA125,并对检验结果进行分析。结果:卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌的血清HE4、CA125联合检测的灵敏度明显高于单项检测,联合检测的特异性低于HE4单项检测,高于CA125单项检测。与术前比较,术后卵巢癌组HE4和CA125水平明显降低,两组差别具有统计学意义(P<0.01),但子宫内膜癌组HE4结果术前与术后水平比较差别无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论:血清HE4和CA125两者联合检测可提高其在卵巢癌、子宫内膜癌中的临床应用价值,HE4可以作为卵巢癌术后随访的客观指标,但尚且不能作为子宫内膜癌术后随访的客观指标。 Objective : To discuss the clinical value of serum human epididymis secretory protein 4 ( HE4 ) and CA125 in ovarian tumor and endometrial carcinoma. Methods: The levels of serum HE4 and CA125 were detected using ELISA and Chemical luminescence microparticle immune assay(CIMA) , then compared and analysed among ovarian tumor group, endometrial carcinoma group, leiomyoma of uterus group and control group. Results: The di- agnostic sensitivity of combined detection of HFA and CA125 in ovarian tumor group and endometrial carcinoma group were higher than respective detection. But the specificity of combined detection was lower than that of serum HFA,higher than that of CA125. Compared with pre- operation, the levels of HFA and CA125 in ovarian tumor group obviously decreased, the difference had statistical significance (P 〈 0.01 ) , but HE4 levels had no statistical difference between pre- operation and post- operation in endometrial carcinoma group (P 〉 0.05 ). Conclusion: The combined detection of serum HFA and CA125 could improve their clinical value in ovarian tumor and endometri- al carcinoma, HFA is a useful index of ovarian tumor after surgical operation,but not the useful index of endometrial carcinoma after surgical operation.
出处 《中国卫生检验杂志》 北大核心 2013年第2期416-417,419,共3页 Chinese Journal of Health Laboratory Technology
关键词 人附睾蛋白4 CA125 卵巢癌 子宫内膜癌 HE4 CA125 Ovarian tumor Endometrial carcinoma
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Kirehhoff C, Habben I, Ive, II R ,et al. A major human epididymis - spe- cific cDNA encodes a protein with sequence homology to extracellular proteinase inhihitors[J]. Biol Repord,1991,45(2) :350 -357.
  • 2Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC et al. Utility of a novel serum tumorbiomarker HFA- in patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the u- terus [ J ]. Gynecol Onco1,2008,110 ( 2 ) : 196 - 201.
  • 3Martina Montagnana, Giuseppe Lippi, Orazio Ruzzenente et al. The U- tility of serum human epididymis protein 4 ( HFA- ) in patients with a pelvic mass[ J ]. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis ,2009,23 ( 5 ) : 331 -335.
  • 4Duffy M J, Bonfrer JM, Kulpa J,et al. CA 125 in ovarian cancer: Euro- pean Group on Tumour Markers guidelines for clinical use [ J ]. lnt J Gynecol Caneer,2005,15 (5) :679 - 691.
  • 5Ginath S, Menczer J, Fintsi Y,et al. Glezerman and 1. Avinoach,Tissue and serum CAI25 expression in endometrial cancer[ J ]. Int J Gynecol Cancer ,2002,12 (4) :372 - 375.
  • 6Nossov V ,Amneus M ,Su f,et al. The early detection of ovarian cancer: from traditional methods to proteomics. Can we really sto better than ser- um CA - 125[J]. Am J Obstet Gynecol,2008,199(3) :215 -223.
  • 7He|lstrom 1, Raycraft J, Hayden - Ledbetter M, et al. The HFA ( WT -DC2 ) protein is a biomarker for ovarian carcinoma[ J ]. Cancer Res, 2003, 63(13) : 3695 -3700.
  • 8Moore RG, Brown AK, Miller MC, et al. The use of multiple novel tumor biomarkers for the detection of ovarian carcinoma in patients with a pelvicmass [ J ]. Gynecol Oncol, 2008, 108 ( 2 ) :402 - 408.

同被引文献56

  • 1World Health Organization. GLOBOCAN 2012: Estimated Cancer incidence, Mortality, and Prevalence Worldwide in 2012. [2015-05-17] Available at: http://globocan.iarc.fr/Default.aspx.
  • 2Ali AT. Reproductive factors and the risk of endometrial cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer, 2014, 24(3): 384-393.
  • 3Lajer H, Elnegaard S, Christensen RD, et al. Survival after stage IA endometrial cancer; can follow-up be altered? A prospective nationwide Danish survey. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand, 2012, 91(8): 976-982.
  • 4Aggarwal P, Kehoe S. Serum tumour markers in gynaecological cancers. Maturitas, 2010, 67(1): 46-53.
  • 5Kirchhoff C, Habben I, Ivell R, et al. A major human epididymis-specific cDNA encodes a protein with sequence homology to extracellular proteinase inhibitors. Biol Reprod, 1991, 45(2): 350-357.
  • 6Zhen S, Bian LH, Chang LL, et al. Comparison of serum human epididymis protein 4 and carbohydrate antigen 125 as markers in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis. Mol Clin Oncol, 2014, 2(4): 559-566.
  • 7Lin J, Qin J, Sangvatanakul V. Human epididymis protein 4 for differential diagnosis between benign gynecologic disease and ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol, 2013, 167(1): 81-85.
  • 8Ferraro S, Braga F, Lanzoni M, et al. Serum human epididymis protein 4 vs carbohydrate antigen 125 for ovarian cancer diagnosis: a systematic review. J Clin Pathol, 2013, 66(4): 273-281.
  • 9Lin JY, Qin JB, Li XY, Dong P, et al. Diagnostic value of human epididymis protein 4 compared with mesothelin for ovarian cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev, 2012, 13(11): 5427-5432.
  • 10Cheng D, Sun Y, He H. The diagnostic accuracy of HE4 in lung cancer: a meta-analysis. Dis Markers, 2015: 352670.

引证文献3

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部