期刊文献+

“李嘉图恶习”与现代主流经济学范式危机

The Ricardian Vice and the Paradigm Crisis of Modern Mainstream Economics
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在"李嘉图恶习"引导下,数学方法在19世纪70年代边际革命后被广泛应用于经济学分析,并被主流经济学视为唯一正统方法。基于经济思想史变迁的视角,研究方法一元化已成为导致当前主流经济学范式危机的重要原因。特别是欧美发达国家发生的金融危机和主权债务危机表明经济学的高度数学化已使经济理论与思想发展严重脱节。摆脱"李嘉图恶习",回归斯密与马克思重视社会关系分析的方法十分重要。 Under the guidance of The Ricardian vice, the mathematical method was widely used in economic analysis and was regarded as the only orthodox method by mainstream economics after the marginal revolution in the 1870s. From the historical perspective of economic thought, the single research method has become an important reason for the current mainstream economics paradigm crisis. The highly mathematical economics has led to economic theory seriously out of line with the thinking of development especially after the global financial crisis and the European debt crisis in the American and European countries. It is very important for the market economy study to get rid of The Ricardian vice and return to Smith and Marx' s social relations analysis.
作者 王璐 李梦洁
出处 《北京行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期84-88,共5页 Journal of Beijing administration institute
基金 国家社会科学基金青年项目(12CJL004) 教育部人文社科研究规划基金项目(10YJA790186) 天津市哲学社会科学重点项目(TJJL08-030)
关键词 李嘉图恶习 主流经济学 范式危机 社会关系分析 The Ricardian vice mainstream economics paradigm crisis a social relations analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1小罗伯特·B.埃克伦德,罗伯特·F.赫伯特.经济理论和方法史[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2001:139.
  • 2布劳格.现代经济学已露游戏人生之病象[N].贾根良,译.经济学消息报.2003-06-20.
  • 3熊彼特.经济分析史:第3卷[M].北京:商务印书馆,1994.
  • 4马克·斯考森.现代经济学的历程::大思想家的生平和思想[M].长春:长春出版社,2006:90-92.
  • 5艾克纳.经济学为什么还不是一门科学[M].北京:北京大学出版社,1990,4..
  • 6莫里斯·阿莱.我对研究工作的热忱[M]//迈克尔·曾伯格.经济学大师的人生哲学.北京:商务印书馆.2011:47.
  • 7钱颖一.理解现代经济学[J].经济社会体制比较,2002(2):1-12. 被引量:291
  • 8KRUGMAN.P. How did economists get it so wrong? [J]. The New York Times Magazine. ,Sep. 2009(2).
  • 9BRITISH ACADEMY. The Global Financial Crisis- Why Didn't Anybody Notice British Academy Forum [EB/OL].http://media.ft.com/cms/3e3b6ca8-11de-b86f- 00144feabdc0.pdf.2009-06.
  • 10马克思恩格斯选集.第2卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.269.

二级参考文献31

  • 1Akerlof, George. "The Market for Lemons: Quality Uncertainty and the Market Mechanism." Quarterly Journal of Economics. 84(3), pp. 488-500, August 1970.
  • 2Akerlof, George. "Procrastination and Obedience." American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings. Richard T. Ely Lecture. 81(1), pp.1-19, May 1991.
  • 3Arrow, Kenneth, and Frank Hahn. General Competitive Analysis. Amsterdam: North-Holland, 1971.
  • 4Black, Duncan. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1958.
  • 5Cheung, Steven N.S. The Theory of Share Tenancy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1969.
  • 6Coase, Ronald. "The Problem of Social Cost." Journal of Law and Economics, 3, pp. 1-44, October, 1960.
  • 7Debreu, Gerald. Theory of Value. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1972.
  • 8Diamond, Douglas, and Philip Dybvig. "Bank Runs, Deposit Insurance, and Liquidity." Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), pp. 401-419, June 1983.
  • 9Fama, Eugene. "Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm." Journal of Political Economy,88(2), pp. 288-307, April 1980.
  • 10Grossman, Gene, and Elhanan Helpman. Special Interest Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 2001.

共引文献635

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部