期刊文献+

A超与超声活体显微镜对白内障患眼前房深度测量的比较 被引量:7

A comparison study of anterior chamber depth using A sonography and biomicroscopy in patient with cataract
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较A超与超声活体显微镜(UBM)测量白内障患眼前房深度(ACD)值的差异。方法系列病例研究。对2008年1月至2010年3月在南京鼓楼医院眼科行白内障术前检查的396例患者(480只眼)分别用A超和UBM测量ACD值。按晶状体前皮质光学区域是否混浊分为两组:前皮质无混浊的各型白内障(前皮质无混浊组)433只眼(占90.21%);皮质性或伴前皮质混浊(前皮质混浊组)的各型白内障47只眼(占9.79%);前者按UBM的ACD测量值分〈3.0mm、3.0~3.5mm、〉3.5mm组。对两种方法的ACD测量值进行配对t检验。结果前皮质无混浊的各型白内障眼ACD平均测量值:UBM(3.24±0.56)mm,A超(3.14±0.56)mm。平均差异(0.10±0.06)mm,两者差异无统计学意义(t=0.128,P=0.082)。其中ACD〈3.0mm组平均测量值:UBM(2.61±0.26)mm,A超(2.50±0.29)mm。平均差异(0.11±0.10)mm,两者差异有统计学意义(t=0.744,P=0.023);伴晶状体前皮质混浊的各型白内障眼ACD平均测量值:UBM(2.51±0.52)mm,A超(3.84±0.55)mm,平均差异(-1.33±0.41)mm,两者差异有统计学意义(t=14.792,P=0.000)。结论光学区域前皮质无混浊的各型白内障眼,A超的ACD平均测量值与UBM相比无明显差异。其中的浅ACD者,两种方法测量值的差异较明显;光学区域前皮质混浊时,A超的测量值远超UBM的ACD值。 Objective To know the difference of measured anterior chamber depth (ACD) in cataract eyes between A-scan and ultrasound biomicroscopy ( UBM ) measurements. Methods Case series study, the ACD of 396 patients (480 eyes with cataract) came from the Department of Ophthalmology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital between January, 2008 and March, 2010, were measured by A-scan and UBM. Two groups were classified by whether the optical area of anterior cortex was transparent or not: 433(90. 21% ) eyes with transparent anterior cortex and 47 (9. 79% ) eyes with opacifie anterior cortex . The former are classified into 3 groups: 〈 3.0 mm, 3.0-3.5 ram, 〉 3.5 mm, according to the ACD value of UBM. The differences of ACD between A-scan and USB readings was analyzed. Results The average ACD value of cataract eyes with transparent anterior cortex was ( 3.24 - 0. 56 ) mm ( measured by USB) and (3.14 ±0. 56) mm (measured by A-scan), respectively. There was no significant difference between these two measurements (t =0. 128,P =0. 082). In eyes with ACD 〈3.0 ram, the average ACD was (2. 61 ±0. 26)ram (by UBM) and (2. 50 ±0. 29)mm (by A-scan), respectively, with a difference of (0. 11 ± 0. 10) ram. There was a statistical significant difference between these two measurements ( t = 0. 744, P = 0. 023 ). The average ACD value of cataract eyes with opacific anterior cortex opacity was (2. 51 ± 0. 52) mm (by UBM) and (3. 84 ±0. 55) mm (by A-scan), respectively, with a difference of ( - 1.33 ± 0.41 ) ram. There was a significant difference between these two values ( t = 14. 792, P = 0. 000 ) . Conclusions In cataract eyes with transparent optic area of anterior cortex, there is no significant difference between measured ACD by A-scan and UBM. In eyes with ACD less than 3.0 mm, there is a significantdifference between measured value by A-scan and UBM. When the optical area of anterior cortex is opacific, A- scan records are much higher than the ACD value measured by UBM.
出处 《中华眼科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期130-133,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ophthalmology
基金 南京市卫生局医学科技发展基金(YKK09106)
关键词 白内障 前房 人体测量术 超声检查 显微镜检查 声学 Cataract Anterior chamber Anthropometry Ultrasonography Microscopy,acoustic
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1代云海,黄钰森,谢立信.角膜屈光手术后人工晶状体度数的测算[J].中华眼科杂志,2008,44(1):82-85. 被引量:9
  • 2黄芳,赵云娥,黄和和.Haigis公式预测白内障术后屈光度的准确性[J].眼科研究,2008,26(3):225-227. 被引量:7
  • 3Osuobeni EP, Oduwaiye KA. The effect of illumination-microscope angle on slit lamp estimate of the anterior chamber depth. Optom Vis Sci,2003,80:237-244.
  • 4Rose LT, Moshegov CN. Comparison of Zeiss IOL Master and applanation A-scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. J Clin Exp Ophthalmol,2003 ,31:121-124.
  • 5袁光华.高频超声成像物理基础//刘磊.眼超声生物显微镜诊断学.北京:科学技术出版社,2002:1-11.
  • 6李崇靖.晶状体病//刘家琦.实用眼科学.北京:人民卫生出版社,1987:324-493.
  • 7施明光.屈光和屈光不正//瞿佳.视光学理论和方法.北京:人民卫生出版社,2004:80-83.
  • 8林少明,李绍珍,惠延年,等.人工晶状体植入术//李凤鸣.眼科全书:第5卷.北京:人民卫生出版社,1996:1673-1674.
  • 9Haigis W. Intraocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery for myopia: Haigis-L formula. J Cataract Refract Surg,2008,34 : 1658-1663.

二级参考文献30

  • 1姜燕,施玉英,杨文利.六种人工晶状体屈光度数计算公式的准确性比较[J].眼科,2007,16(2):100-103. 被引量:12
  • 2Speicher L. Intra-ocular lens calculation status after corneal refractive surgery. Curt Opin Ophthalmol,2001,12 : 17-29.
  • 3Seitz B, Langenbucher A, Nguyen NX, et al. Underestimation of intraocular lens power for cataract surgery after myopic photorefractive keratectomy. Ophthalmology, 1999,106:693-702.
  • 4Seitz B. Intraocular lens power calculation in eyes after corneal refractive surgery. J Refract Surg, 2000, 16:349-361.
  • 5Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, et al. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1988, 14:17-24.
  • 6Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1990, 16:333-340.
  • 7Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: A comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1993, 19:700-712.
  • 8Holladay JT. Consultations in refractive surgery. Refract Corneal Surg, 1989, 5:203.
  • 9Hoffer KJ. Intraocular lens power calculation for eyes after refractive keratotomy. J Refract Surg, 1995, 21:490-493.
  • 10Koch D, Wang I. Calculating IOL power in eyes that have had refractive surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg, 2003, 29: 2039- 2042.

共引文献13

同被引文献45

引证文献7

二级引证文献34

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部