期刊文献+

血清VEGF水平对中晚期宫颈癌诊断价值及同期放化疗疗效影响研究 被引量:12

Diagnostic value of serum VEGF level for advanced cervical cancer and its relationship withtherapeutic efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨血清血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)水平对宫颈癌诊断价值及其同期放化疗预后影响。方法选择经病理证实的中晚期宫颈鳞状细胞癌80例、慢性宫颈炎20例、体检健康人20例作为研究对象。酶联免疫吸附分析法测定研究对象血清VEGF基线水平,以及宫颈癌患者同期放化疗后3个月VEGF水平,分析其与临床疗效关系。结果基线水平宫颈癌患者血清VEGF水平为237.36μg/L,明显高于慢性宫颈炎和健康者(142.36斗g/L,t=4.03,P=0.000)。血清VEGF水平与肿瘤临床分期、分化程度及淋巴结转移密切相关,VEGF诊断宫颈癌的最佳界质为〉197.52μg/L,敏感性为0.88,特异性为0.72。VEGF在同期放化疗前后变化与疗效关系密切,完全缓解者变化明显大于进展者,VEGF基线高水平者进展或死亡明显高于低水平者。结论血清VEGF水平对宫颈癌诊断价值不高,与宫颈癌分期、分级及淋巴转移密切相关,对宫颈癌同期放化疗预后具有一定预测价值。 Objective To investigate the diagnostic value of serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) level for ceivical cancer and its relationship with the therapeutic efficacy of concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). Methods Eighty patients with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced cervical squamous cell carcinoma ( CSCC ), 20 patients with chronic cervicitis, and 20 healthy persons (as controls) were enrolled in the study. The CSCC patients received CCRT. All the subjects had their baseline serum VEGF levels measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA);also, the CSCC patients had their serum VEGF levels measured by ELISA at 3 months after CCRT. The relationship between the serum VEGF levels and therapeutic efficacy of CCRT was analyzed. Results The CSCC patients had a significantly higher baseline serum VEGF level than the chronic cervicitis patients and controls (237. 36 μg/L vs. 142. 36 μg/L, t = 4.03, P = 0. 000 ). The serum VEGF level was closely related to tumor stage, tumor differentiation, and lymph node metastasis. A serum VEGF level above 197.52 Ixg/L was the optimal cut point for diagnosing cervical cancer, with a sensitivity of 0. 88 and a specificity of 0. 72. The serum VEGF levels before and after CCRT showed a close relationship with the therapeutic efficacy. The patients achieving a complete remission had a significantly greater change in serum VEGF level than those with progression; the patients with high baseline serum VEGF levels had a significantly higher tumor progression or death rate than those with low baseline serum VEGF levels. Conclusions Serum VEGF level has poor diagnostic value for cervical cancer, though it is closely related to the tumor stage, tumor differentiation, and lymph node metastasis of cervical cancer. However, serum VEGF level has some predictive value for the therapeutic efficacy of CCRT in patients with cervical cancer.
出处 《中华放射肿瘤学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期99-101,共3页 Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
关键词 血管内皮生长因子 相关性 宫颈肿瘤 放化疗法 Vascular endothelial growth factor Related Cervical neoplasms/ radiochemotherapy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Bachtiary B, Selzer E, Knocke TH, et al. Serum VEGF levels in patients undergoing primary radiotherapy for cervical cancer: impact on progression-free survival. Cancer Lett,2002,179 : 197- 203.
  • 2Katanyoo K, Chantarasri A, Chongtanakon M, et al. Pretreatment levels of serum vascular endothelial growth factor do not correlate with outcome in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prey,2011,12:699-702.
  • 3Mitsuhashi A, Suzuka K, Yamazawa K, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor ( VEGF ) and VEGF-C levels as tumor markers in patients with cervical carcinoma. Cancer, 2005,103 : 724-730.
  • 4Rusiecka M, Sedlaczck P, Rusiecki L, et al. The value of the cytocins and the solubility of theirs receptors in the serum of the patients with the cervical cancer. Ginekol Pol,2007,78:691-695.
  • 5王新玲,葛崇华,黄艳春,阿娜古丽.阿依白克力,李庭芳.血清VEGF-C在新疆维吾尔族妇女宫颈上皮内瘤变及宫颈鳞癌中的表达及意义[J].中国妇幼保健,2011,26(1):112-114. 被引量:6

二级参考文献13

  • 1Grigsby FW, Siegol BA, Dehdashti F. Lymph node staging by position emission tomography in patients with carcinoma of the cervix [J]. Clin Oncol, 2001, 19 (17) : 3745.
  • 2Kark - Kainen M J, Petrova TV. Vascular endothelial growth factor receptors in the regulation of angiogenesis and lymphangiogenesis [J] . Oncogene, 2000, 19 (49): 5598.
  • 3Kaipainen A, Korhonem J, Mustonen T, et al. Expression of the like tyrosine gene become to lymphatic endothelium during development [J]. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 1995, 92 (8) : 1599.
  • 4Yu XM. Lo CY, Lam AK, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor C correlates with lymph node metastasis and high - risk tumor profiles in papillary thyroid carcinoma [J] . Ann Surg, 2008, 247 (3) : 466.
  • 5Nathanson SD. Insights into mechanisms of lymph node metastasis [J] . Cancer, 2003, 98 (2) : 413.
  • 6Duff SE, Jeziorska M, Rosa DD, et al. Vascular endothelial growth factors and receptors in colorectal cancer implications for antiangiogenic therapy [J] . Cancer, 2006, 42 (2): 112.
  • 7Ding S, Li C, Lin S, et al. Distinct roles of VEGF - A and VEGF - C in tumour metastasis of gastric carcinoma [ J] . Oncol Rep, 2007, 17 (2) : 369.
  • 8Tamura M, Ohta Y. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor C level in patient with primary nonsmall cell lung carcinoma : a possible diagnosistool for lymph node metastasis [J] . Cancer, 2003, 98 (6) : 1217.
  • 9Mathur SP, Mathur RS, Gray EA, et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor - C ( VEGF - C ) as a specific biomarker for advanced cervical cancer relationship to insulin - like growth factor Ⅱ ( IGF - Ⅱ ), IGF binding protein 3 ( IGF - BP3 ) and VEGF - A [ corrected][J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2005, 98 (3) : 467.
  • 10Mitsuhashi A, Suzuka K, Yamazawa K ,et al. Serum vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and VEGF - C levels as tumor markers in patients with cervical carcinoma[ J]. Cancer,2005 ,'103(4) :724.

共引文献5

同被引文献120

  • 1才保加,祁玉娟,周为,王晓龙,马玉斌,马晓明.老年胃腺癌患者癌组织Nanog、Oct-4和Furin的表达及意义[J].中国老年学杂志,2014,34(11):2939-2941. 被引量:4
  • 2Jemal A, Murray T,Samuels A,et al. Cancer statistics 2003 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin ,2003,53:5-26.
  • 3Belani CP,Goss G,Blumenschein G. Recent clinical develop- menls and rationale for combining targeted agents in non- small cell lung caneer(NSCLC) [J]. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 2012,38(3): 173-184.
  • 4Le T, Dat T, Matsuo. Identification of genes potentially involved in bone lnetastasis by genome-wide gene expression profile anal- ysis of non-small cell lung cancer in mice [J]. International jour- nal of oncnlogy, 2012,40 (5) : 1455-1469.
  • 5Koichi ,Yoshiyama, Yasuhiro,et al. Personalized peptide vac- cination in patients with refractory non-small cell lung can- cer [J]. International Journal of Ontology ,2012,40(5 ):1492- 1500.
  • 6Krauze AV, Won M, Graves tumor recurrence using urinary C, et al. Predictive value of vascular endothelial factor lev- els in patients receiving radiation therapy for Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) [J] .Biomark Res, 2013, 1 (1): 29 - 32.
  • 7Bhatta SS, Wroblewski KE, Agarwal KL, et al. Effects of vas- cular endothelial growth factor signaling inhibition on human e- rythropoiesis [J] . Oncologist, 2013, 18 (8): 965-970.
  • 8Tamura T, Kuwahara A, Yamamori M, et al. VEGF -634C/ G genotype is predictive of long - term survival after treatment with a definitive 5 - fluorouracil/cisplatin - based chemoradio- therapy in Japanese patients with esophageal squamous cell car- cinoma [J] . lnt J Med Sei, 2012, 9 (10) : 833 -837.
  • 9BraictJ EI, Fotopoulou C, Chekerov R, et al. Role of serum concentration of VEGFR1 and TIMP2 on clinical outcome in primary cervical cancer: results of a companion protocol of the randomized, NOGGO - AGO phase Ill adjuvant trial of simul- taneous cisplatin - based radiochemotherapy vs. carboplatin and paclitaxel containing sequential radiotherapy [J] . Cyto- kine, 2013, 61 (3): 755-758.
  • 10Seibold ND, Schild SE, Gebhard MP,et a l. Prognostic impact of VEGF and FLT - 1 receptor expression in patients with lo-cally advanced sqaamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck [ J ]. Strahlenther Onkol, 2013,189 ( 8 ) : 639 - 646.

引证文献12

二级引证文献74

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部