期刊文献+

舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌的疗效和安全性 被引量:4

The safety and efficacy of sunitinib treatment for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma
暂未订购
导出
摘要 背景与目的:舒尼替尼治疗转移性肾癌的有效性已经被Ⅱ期和Ⅲ期临床实验验证,在多个临床指南中推荐为晚期肾癌的一线治疗方案。本研究观察舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌的疗效和安全性。方法:中国医学科学院肿瘤医院于2008年8月—2011年12月收治晚期肾细胞癌患者52例,男性43例,女性9例。年龄29~76岁,中位年龄54.5岁。原发肾脏病灶手术切除45例,穿刺病理证实7例。肾透明细胞癌48例,肾乳头状细胞癌4例。治疗方案:舒尼替尼50 mg,每天1次,治疗4周停2周为1个周期;每2个周期行影像学检查评价疗效。结果:随访1~36个月,3例因患者经济情况停药,49例可评价疗效。完全缓解(complete remission,CR)2例(4.1%),部分缓解(partial remission,PR)10例(20.4%),疾病稳定(stable disease,SD)31例(63.3%),疾病进展(progression of disease,PD)6例(12.2%),疾病控制率(CR+PR+SD)为87.8%。1年疾病控制率为61%,1年生存率为85%。中位疾病无进展期(progression free survival,PFS)为15个月,中位总生存时间(overall survival,OS)为23个月。根据病理类型、转移部位和体力状况评分等将患者分为亚组进一步统计。肾透明细胞癌组中位PFS为12个月,中位OS为23个月。中位PFS在单脏器转移组为18个月,多脏器转移组为9个月,在术后病理确诊组为18个月,在穿刺病理确诊组为8个月;在美国东部肿瘤协作组(Eastern CooperativeOncology Group,ECOG)评分分组中,0分组为15个月,1分组为12个月。中位生存时间在单脏器转移组未达到,多脏器转移组为12个月;在术后病理确诊组为23个月,在穿刺病理确诊组为9个月;在ECOG为0分组未达到,在ECOG为1分组为23个月。常见不良反应包括手足皮肤反应、乏力、白细胞降低、血小板降低、口腔黏膜炎及高血压等,发生的Ⅲ级不良反应包括手足皮肤反应、白细胞降低、血小板降低、贫血、腹泻、口腔黏膜炎、甲状腺功能减低、呕吐和浮肿。通过对症支持及减量,不良反应可以控制并耐受。结论:舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌疗效显著,常见不良反应患者可耐受,严重不良反应需要医疗干预。 Background and purpose: The effectiveness of sunitinib in the treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma has been verified by phase Ⅱ and Ⅲclinical trails. Sunitinib is approved multinationally for the first- line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Our study was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of sunitinib in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Methods: A total number of 52 patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma were enrolled from Aug. 2008 to Dec. 2011, during which, 43 were male, 9 were female, the median age was 54.5 years (ranged from 29 to 76 years). Forty-five patients received prior radical nephrectomy, 7 patientsreceived biopsy. Forty-eight patients were diagnosed as renal clear cell carcinoma, 4 patients were diagnosed as renal papillary cell carcinoma. Sunitinib monotherapy was administered in repeated 6-week cycles of daily oral 50 mg for 4 weeks, followed by 2 weeks off. CT or MR/scan was used to evaluate the efficacy every 2 cycles. Results: Follow ups were raging from 1 to 36 months. Forty-nine patients could be evaluated the efficacy, 3 patients discontinued for lacking of financial support. The disease control rate was 87.8%, 2 (4.1%) patients with complete response (CR), 10 (20.4%) patients with partial response (PR), 31 (63.3%) patients with stable disease (SD), and 6 (12.2%) patients with progression disease (PD) as the best tumor response. The 1-year control rate was 61%, and the 1-year survival rate was 85%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15 months, and median overall survival (OS) was 23 months. According to the pathological types, metastatic sites, and ECOG status, the patients were divided into subgroups. In patients with clear cell renal cell carcinoma, median PFS was 12 months, and median OS was 23 months. Median PFS was longer in patients with single-organ metastasis compared with multi-organ metastases subgroup (18 vs 9 month), surgery compared with biopsy subgroup (18 vs 8 month), and ECOG 0 score compared with ECOG 1 score subgroup (15 vs 12 month). Median OS has not been reached in single-organ metastasis compared with 12 months in multi-organ metastasis subgroup, was 23 months in surgery compared with 9 months in biopsy subgroup, and has not been reached in ECOG 0 score compared with 23 months in ECOG 1 score subgroup. The most common adverse events were hand- foot syndrome, fatigue, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, mucositis, and hypertension. Grade 3 adverse events included hand-foot syndrome, leucopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, diarrhea, mucositis, hypothyroidism, vomiting, and facial edema. All adverse events were ameliorated by supportive treatment or dose reduction. Conclusion: Sunitinib was efficacious in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma. Most adverse events were tolerable, and grade 3 adverse events need medical treatment.
出处 《中国癌症杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期137-143,共7页 China Oncology
关键词 肾细癌胞 肿瘤转移 舒尼替尼 Renal cell carcinoma Neoplasm metastasis Sunitinib
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献23

  • 1Veronese ML, Mosenkis A, Flaherty KT, Gallagher M, Stevenson JP, Townsend RR, et al. Mechanisms of hypertension associated with BAY 43-9006. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 1363-1369.
  • 2Rini BI, Schiller JH, Fruehauf JP. Association of diastolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg with overall survival in patients treated with axitinib (AG-013736). J Clin Oncol 2008; 26: abstract 3543.
  • 3Spano JP, Chodkiewicz C, Maurel J, Wong R, Wasan H, Barone C, et al. Efficacy of gemcitabine plus axitinib compared with gemcitabine alone in patients with advaneed pancreatic cancer: an open-label randornised phase II study. Lancet 2008; 371: 2101-2108.
  • 4Rixe O, Billemont B, Izzedine H. Hypertension as a predictive factor of sunitinib activity. Ann Oncol 2007; 18: 1117.
  • 5Trotti A, Colevas AD, Setser A, Rusch V, Jaques D, Budach V, et al. CTCAE v3.0: development of a comprehensive grading system for the adverse effects of cancer treatment. Semin Radiat Oncol 2003; 13: 176-181.
  • 6Bono P, Rautiola J, Utriainen T, Joensuu H. Hypertension as predictor of sunitinib treatment outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Acta Oncol 2011; 50: 569-573.
  • 7Motzer RJ, Michaelson MD, Redman BG, Hudes GR, Wilding G, Figlin RA, et al. Activity of SUl1248, a multitargeted inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor and platelet-derived growth factor receptor, in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol 2006; 24: 16-24.
  • 8Motzer RJ, Rini BI, Bukowski RM, Curti BD, George DJ, Hudes GR, et al. sunitinib in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. JAMA 2006; 295:2516-2524.
  • 9Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, Michaelson MD, Bukowski RM, Rixe O, et al. sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 115-124.
  • 10Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA, Wanders J, Kaplan RS, Rubinstein L, et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada. J Natl Cancer Inst 2000; 92: 205-216.

共引文献42

同被引文献21

  • 1Kapoor AK, Hotte SJ. Current status of cytokine therapy in manage- ment of patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma[ J]. Can Urol Assoc J,2007,1 (2 Suppl) : S28 - 33.
  • 2Mihaly Z, Sztupinszki Z, Surowiak P. A comprehensive overview of targeted therapy in metastatic renal cell carcinoma[ J]. Curr Cancer Drug Targets, 2012,12 (7) :857 - 872.
  • 3Motzer R J, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Sunitinib versus interferon alfa in metastatic renal- cell carcinoma[ J]. N Engl J Med,2007, 356(2) :115 - 124.
  • 4Motzer 1LI, Hutson TE, Tomczak P, et al. Overall survival and upda- ted results for sunitinib compared with interferon alfa in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma [ J ]. J Clin Oncol, 2009,27 (22) :3584 - 3590.
  • 5Gore ME, Szczylik C, Porta C, et al. Safety and efficacy of sunitinib for metastatic renal - cell carcinoma: an expanded - access trial [J]. Lancet Oncol,2009,10(8) :757 -763.
  • 6Motzer R J, Escudier B, Bukowski R, et al. Prognostic factors for sur- vival in 1059 patients treated with sunitinib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma[ J]. Br J Cancer,2013,108 (12) :2470 - 2477.
  • 7Kollmannsberger C, Bjarnason G, Bumett P, et al. Sunitinib in me- tastatic renal cell carcinoma:recommendations for management of noncardiovascular toxicities [ J ]. Oncologist, 2011,16 ( 5 ) : 543 - 553.
  • 8Ravaud A, Sire M. Arterial hypertension and clinical benefit of sunitinib, sorafenib and bevacizumab in first and second - line treatment of metastatic renal cell cancer[ J]. Ann Oncol,2009,20 (5) :966 -967.
  • 9Rini BI,Cohen DP,Lu DR,et al. Hypertension as a biomarker of efficacy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma treated with sunitinib [ J ]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2011,103 (9) :763 - 773.
  • 10Zygulska AL, Krzemieniecki K, Sowa - Staszczak A, et al. Hypot- hyroidism during treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors [ J ]. En- dokrynologia Polska,2012,63 (4) :302 -306.

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部