期刊文献+

食物的信任——中国社会的饮食观念及其转变 被引量:14

Anthropological Discussions on Trust and Integrity
原文传递
导出
摘要 处于转型期的中国社会,由于相应制度的不完善、相关部门的监管不力以及社会价值观的不确定性等因素,“被污染”的食物被摆在了餐桌上,进入了公众的饮食生活,直接或间接地影响着人们身体的安全和健康。在现代食品行业中的各种“内幕”频频被揭露之后,人们对于, Trust and integrity,as interpreted by classical social theorists,are the self-evident elements that determine whether a society is harmonious or not.In China,trust and integrity have become one of the focuses of public attention.People cast a questioning eye on almost everything: food,utensil,medicine,entertainment,and even the social institutions and the credibility of government officials.This phenomenon indicates that China is already a'risk-loaded society',and its society is in the midst of a'confidence crisis'.The three authors of this discussion proceed from different perspectives to examine issues concerning trust,credibility,as well as integrity.Fan Ke discusses the concepts of trust and credit,and other issues of power and trust,and points out that the trust issue can be attributed to social transformation,but more importantly,to power itself.Shao Jing analyzes integrity issues from the linguistic point of view,and explains that in social and political situations relevant to people's daily life,untrustworthy promises have led to integrity issues,and the current integrity discourse actually reflects the lack of credibility of power in front of the public.Zhao Xudong and Wang Shasha coauthor the article in which they discuss the problem of food trust,claiming that Chinese people's food trust is not entirely in line with the standard of Western social science.When one considers the trust in food,the traditional differential pattern has a profound impact.Such discussions not only contribute to the improvement of academic understanding of social problems,but also constructive to the building of harmonious society and cultural development in a dramatically changing Chinese society.
出处 《江苏行政学院学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第2期75-80,共6页 The Journal of Jiangsu Administration Institute
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献19

共引文献407

同被引文献201

引证文献14

二级引证文献83

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部