期刊文献+

黄土区农田和草地生态系统土壤呼吸差异及其影响因素 被引量:18

Differences in Soil Respiration Between Cropland and Grassland Ecosystems and Factors Influencing Soil Respiration on the Loess Plateau
原文传递
导出
摘要 明确土地利用方式变化对土壤呼吸速率的影响,对预测黄土区退耕还草条件下的土壤碳循环变化具有重要的意义.于2010年7月~2011年12月,利用Li-8100系统(Li-COR,Lincoln,NE,USA)监测黄土高原沟壑区塬坡上相邻农田和草地的土壤呼吸速率,用以验证不同土地利用方式是否导致土壤呼吸速率的变化.结果发现,土地利用方式的改变导致了土壤呼吸速率的显著(P<0.05)变化,试验期间草地平均土壤呼吸速率[1.67μmol·(m2.s)-1]较相邻农田[1.35μmol·(m2.s)-1]提高24%(P<0.05),累积土壤呼吸草地(856 g·m-2)较农田(694 g·m-2)提高了23%(P<0.05).农田与草地的土壤温度差异显著,草地平均土壤温度(14.9℃)较农田(12.4℃)高2.5℃(P<0.05).农田和草地生态系统土壤温度与土壤呼吸均呈显著的指数关系(P<0.000 1).但农田和草地生态系统中土壤呼吸对温度响应存在本质差异(α=0.05),农田土壤呼吸的Q10(2.30)高于草地(1.74).土壤温度能够很好地解释农田和草地生态系统之间土壤呼吸的差异. Understanding the effect of land-use change on soil respiration rates becomes critical in predicting soil carbon cycling under conversion of arable into grassland on the Loess Plateau. From July 2010 to December 2011, CO2 efflux from the soil surface was measured between 08:00 to 10:00 am in clear days by a Licor-8100 closed chamber system (Li-COR, Lincoln, NE, US). Also, soil temperature and soil moisture at the 5-cm depth was measured using a Li-Cor thermocouple and a hand-held frequency-domain reflectometer (ML2x, Deha-T Devices Ltd, UK) at each PVC collar, respectively. We found marked differences(P 〈 0.05) in soil respiration related to different land-use: the mean cropland soil respiration [ 1.35 μmol·(m2·s) ^-1 was 24% (P 〈 0.05 ) less than the paired grassland soil respiration [ 1.67 μmol·(m2·s) ^-1] (P 〈 0.05 ) during the period of experiment and the cumulative CO2-C emissions in grassland (856 g·m 2) was 23% (P 〈0.05) higher than that in cropland (694 g.m-2). Soil moisture from 0-5 cm depth was much drier in cropland and significantly different between cropland and grassland except for winter. However, there were no clear relationships between soil moisture and soil respiration. Soil temperature at 5-cm depth was 2.5℃ higher in grassland during the period of experiment (P 〈 0.05). Regression of soil temperature vs. soil respiration indicated significant exponential relationships both in grassland and cropland. Besides, there were intrinsic differences in response of soil respiration to temperature between the cropland and grassland ecosystems : grassland and cropland respiration response was significantly different at the α = 0.05 level, also expressed by a higher temperature sensitivity of soil respiration ( Q10 ) in cropland ( 2. 30) relative to grassland (1.74). Soil temperature of cropland and grassland can explain 79% of the variation in the soil respiration in grassland, compared to 82% in cropland. Therefore, land-use change can alter soil CO2 efflux under similar edaphie and climate conditions in the gully region of the Loess Plateau. The soil temperature difference between cropland and grassland can explain the soil respiration difference caused by land-use change, which was confirmed by the validation results.
出处 《环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第3期1026-1033,共8页 Environmental Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(41071338)
关键词 土壤呼吸速率 农田 草地 土壤温度 土壤水分 黄土高原 soil respiration cropland grassland soil temperature soil mosture Loess Plateau
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Walker B H. The terrestrial biosphere and global change: implications for natural and managed ecosystems [ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. 271-304.
  • 2Kaye J P, Hart S C. Restoration and canopy-type effects on soil respiration in a ponderosa pine-bunchgrass ecosystem [ J]. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 199g, 62(4) : 1062-1072.
  • 3Raich J W, Tufekciogul A. Vegetation and sol| respiration: correlations and controls [ J ]. Biogeochemistry, 2000, 48 ( 1 ) : 71-90.
  • 4Smith D L, Johnson L. Vegetation-mediated changes in microclimate reduce soil respiration as woodlands expand into grasslands [ J ]. Ecology, 2004, 85 ( 12 ) : 3348- 3361.
  • 5Kellman L, Behrami H, Risk D. Changes in seasonal soil respiration with pasture conversion to forest in Atlantic Canada [ J]. Biogeochemistry, 2007, 82( 1 ) : 101-109.
  • 6Geiger R, Aron R H, Todhunter P. Climate near the ground [M]. (5th ed. ). Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1995.
  • 7Hoch G A, Briggs J M, Johnson L C. Assessing the rate, mechanisms, and consequences of the conversion of tallgrass prairie to Juniperus virginiana Forest [ J]. Ecosystems, 2002, $(6) : 578-586.
  • 8Jim6nez C, Tejedor M, Rodriguez M. Influence of land use changes on the soil temperature regime of Andosols on Tenerife, Canary Islands, Spain [ J]. European Journal of Soil Science, 2007, 58(2) : 445-449.
  • 9Wang C P, Liu M C, Lin K C, et al. Effects of fire and vegetation types on soil temperature and chemistry at Chihsing Mountain, Taiwan[ J]. Taiwan Journal of Forest Science, 2003, 18(1) : 43-54.
  • 10周光益,陈步峰,曾庆波,黄金,李意德,张振才.尖峰岭热带山地雨林更新林产流特征研究[J].林业科学研究,1993,6(1):70-75. 被引量:164

二级参考文献106

共引文献709

同被引文献315

引证文献18

二级引证文献110

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部