期刊文献+

防屈曲支撑在超高层建筑结构伸臂桁架中的应用 被引量:24

Application of unbonded brace in super high-rise structure with cantilever truss
原文传递
导出
摘要 带加强层的超高层建筑结构多采用伸臂桁架结构形式。出于提高结构抗震性能的需要,工程中常采用拉压性能稳定的防屈曲支撑代替易失稳的普通钢支撑作为伸臂桁架的斜腹杆。采用有限元分析软件ABAQUS的动力弹塑性分析方法,比较了某超高层结构分别采用防屈曲支撑和普通钢支撑作为伸臂桁架斜腹杆,在设防烈度和超烈度罕遇地震作用下的结构变形特征、构件内力及剪力墙损伤等非线性动力响应。分析结果表明,与普通钢支撑相比,防屈曲支撑刚度和强度指标易控制,大变形下滞回性能稳定,罕遇地震作用下能率先屈服吸收地震能量,抗震性能良好。 Cantilever truss was often adopted for super high-rise structure with the strengthening layer. Because of the stable tension and compression performance, unbonded braces were widely accepted in projects to replace the ordinary steel supports to increase structure seismic performance. Nonlinear time-history analysis method by software ABAQUS was used to analyze the seismic performance of structure with unbonded braces or ordinary steel supports under the rare earthquake, including the deformation, member force and shear wall damage etc. The results show that compared with the ordinary steel supports, the unbonded braces have good seismic performance, and the stiffness and strength can be easily controlled. Hysteretic behaviors are stable under large deformation, and can absorb the seismic energy firstly under the rare earthquake.
出处 《建筑结构》 CSCD 北大核心 2013年第5期54-59,96,共7页 Building Structure
关键词 超高层建筑结构 防屈曲支撑 动力弹塑性分析 抗震性能 super high-rise structure unbonded brace nonlinear time-history analysis seismic performance
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献37

  • 1李妍,吴斌,王倩颖,欧进萍.防屈曲钢支撑阻尼器的试验研究[J].土木工程学报,2006,39(7):9-14. 被引量:68
  • 2[19]Brown, A. P. ,Aiken, I. D. and Jafarazadeh, F. J. (2001).Buckling restrained braces provide the key to the seismic retro fit of the Wallace F. Bennett Federal Building. Modern Steel Construction, August, 29- 37.
  • 3[20]Wada, A. , Connor, J. , Kawai, H. , Iwata, M. , and Watanabe,A. (1992). Damage tolerant structures. Proceedings, 5th U.S. -Japan Workshop on the Improvement of Structural Design and Construction Practices, ATC 15 - 4, Applied Technology Council, San Diego, CA, 27-39.
  • 4[22]Wakabayashi, M. , Nakamura, T. , Kashibara, A. , Morizono,T. And Yokoyama, H. (1973). Experimental study of elastoplastic properties of precast concrete wall panels with built-in insulating braces, Summaries of Technical Papers of Annual Meeting,Architectural Institute of Japan, 1041 - 1044. (in Japanese)
  • 5[23]Inoue,K. and Sawaisumi S. (1992). Bracing design criterion of the reinforced concrete panel including unbonded steel diagonal braces,Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering,Architectural Institute of Japan, 432, 41 49. ( in Japanese)
  • 6[24]Fujimoto, M. , Wada, A. , Saeki, E. , Watanabe, A. , and Hito mi,Y. (1988). A study on the unbonded brace encased in buckling-restraining concrete and steel tube. Journal of Structural Engineering,Architectural Institute of Japan, No. 034B,249-258. (in Japanese)
  • 7[25]Kalyanaraman, V. , Sridhara, B. N. , Mahadevan, K. , (1994).Sleeved column system." Proceedings, SSRC Task Group Meetings and Task Force Sessions, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA.
  • 8[26]Prasad,B. (1992). Experimental investigation of sleeved column, Proceedings, 33rd Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference,American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronau tics, Dallas.
  • 9[27]Sridhara,B. N. (1990). Sleeved column-as a basic compression member. Proceedings, 4th International Conference on Steel Structures & Space Frames,Singapore,181 188.
  • 10[28]Clark,P. ,Frank,K. ,Krawinkler,H. ,and Shaw,R. ,(1997).Protocol for fabrication, inspection, testing, and documentation of beam-column connection tests and other experimental specimens. Report No. SAC/BD-97/02, SAC Joint Venture, Sacramento, CA.

共引文献245

同被引文献156

引证文献24

二级引证文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部