摘要
美国近日修改《1930年关税法》授权美国商务部对以中国为代表的所谓"非市场经济国家"征收反补贴税,是对来自中国的进口产品新一轮贸易保护主义的表现。WTO规则并未禁止对"非市场经济国家"反补贴,因此美国此次修法并不违反其在WTO项下的义务,但美国如果对来自中国的产品按照"非市场经济国家"使用替代国方法进行"双反"救济,依据WTO争端解决上诉机构"对来自中国的产品的反补贴和反倾销措施"报告,将很可能违反WTO协定的"适当金额"要求,构成双重救济。中国当前最重要的是积极应对现实的"双反"调查,而长远的目标则是争取美国对中国完全市场经济地位的承认。
U.S. has recently amended the Tariff Act of 1930, which authorizes U.S. Ministry of Com- merce to impose countervailing duty on ＂non - market economy states＂ including China. It is obviously new - round trade protectionism against Chinese importation. Under WTO rules the countervailing measures against ＂non -market economy state＂ are not prohibited, so this amendment is not in violation of WTO obligations. Nevertheless, if U.S. treats China as ＂non - market economy state＂ and resorts to double remedies of anti - dumping and countervailing duties by means of surrogate approach, U.S. may violate the ＂appropriate a- mount＂ requirement and constitute double remedies in accordance with the Report of Appellate Body of DSB on United States -Definitive Anti -dumping and Countervailing Duties on Certain Products from China. Therefore, it is of vital importance for China to positively respond and defend the anti - dumping and counter- vailing investigation and to gain recognition of full market economy status from U.S. in the long run.
出处
《北方法学》
CSSCI
2013年第1期89-93,共5页
Northern Legal Science
基金
教育部社会科学基金青年项目"国际货物买卖损害赔偿制度实证研究"(项目编号09YJC820086)
武汉大学"70后"学者学术发展计划项目"可持续发展战略下的环境法治"
中国法学会2012年青年项目"中国稀土贸易管理制度法律研究"[项目编号CLS(2012)C80]的研究成果
关键词
关税法修订案
非市场经济国家
WTO“双反”
双重救济
Amendment to Tariff Act of 1930 non - market economy state WTO anti - dumping and countervailing double remedies
