摘要
目的观察风池穴"温通针法"对贝尔麻痹疗效的影响。方法将发病1星期以上的40例患者随机分为两组,分别为A组和B组。A组为常规针刺治疗组,取患侧翳风、牵正、阳白、太阳、四白、迎香、地仓、侠承浆、中渚、合谷、太冲,直刺或横刺,采用G6805-2型电针仪,选连续波,频率为1 Hz,强度以患者刚能觉察跳动并能耐受为宜,通电20 min,期间不行针。B组在A组基础上加取风池穴并行"温通针法"。比较接受针刺治疗第10天、第30天和第60天时H-B面神经功能分级和区域(部位)评分。结果两组疗效比较P<0.05,B组疗效优于A组。结论在常规针刺的基础上加用风池穴"温通针法"治疗贝尔麻痹在疗效方面优于单纯采用常规针刺治疗。
Objective To investigate the therapeutic effect ofwarming-unblocking acupuncture at point Fengchi （GB20） on Bell＇s palsy. Method Forty patients, in whom the duration of disease was more than one week, were randomly allocated to two groups, group A and group B. Group A received conventional acupuncture treatment. Yifeng （TEl7）, Qianzheng （Ex）, Yangbai （GB 14）, Taiyang （Ex-HN5）, Sibai （ST2）, Yingxiang （LI20）, Dicang （ST4）, Xiachengjiang （Ex）, Zhongzhu （TE3）, Hegu （LI4） and Taichong （LR3） were selected on the affected side. Perpendicular or transverse needle insertion was performed. A G6805-2 Multi-Purpose Health Device was used. The device was set to produce continuous electrical stimulation at a frequency of 1 Hz and an intensity as high as the patient just felt vibrations and could tolerate. The electrostimulation was set for 20 minutes. The needles were not manipulated during electrical stimulation. Group B received warming-unblocking acupuncture at point Fengchi selected additionally as well as the treatment given to group A. The House-Brackmann Facial Nerve Grading System scores were compared at 10, 30 and 60 days after acupuncture treatment. Result By comparison, the therapeutic effect was better in group B than in group A （P〈 0.05）. Conclusion Warming-unblocking acupuncture at point Fengchi in addition to conventional acupuncture is superior to conventional acupuncture alone in treating Bell＇s palsy.
出处
《上海针灸杂志》
2013年第2期108-109,共2页
Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion
基金
上海市中医临床优势专科(专病)(2008YSZB006)
上海市长宁区人才"创新团队"项目资助
关键词
针刺
穴
风池
面神经麻痹
温通针法
贝尔麻痹
Acupuncture
Point, Fengchi （GB20）
Facial paralysis
Warming-unblocking acupuncture
Bell＇s palsy
