摘要
医疗损害案件审理中法官对鉴定意见过分依赖，导致司法实践中技术权对司法权的僭越，司法公正受到影响，诉讼成本也相应增加。本文分析了法官对鉴定意见过分依赖的原因，进而提出了完善医疗过失的认定标准、完善质证程序、建立专家辅助人制度等三条解决路径，以期为医疗损害制度的理论完善和司法实践提供参考。
The judge＇s over-reliance on expertise in the trial of the medical damage cases results in an arrogation of the technology rights over the judicial power in the judicial practice, which will affect the judicial justice and increase the cost of litigation. The essay analyses the reasons of the judge＇s over-reliance on expertise, and thus proposes the following suggestions： perfection of cross-examination procedures the perfection of the standard of identifying medical negligence, the and the establishment of the system of expert auxiliary, with the purpose of offering some feasible references for improving the medical damage theory and the judicial practice.
出处
《医学与法学》
2013年第1期62-65,共4页
Medicine and Jurisprudence
基金
本文系四川医事卫生法治研究中心立项资助项目“医疗损害鉴定模式的重构”（项目编号：YF11-Y10）及联合保险经纪集团2012年度医疗卫生风险管理服务体系立项资助项目“侵权法视域下医疗过失认定标准研究”（项目编号：LHYLFXZD201207）的阶段性成果.
关键词
医疗损害
鉴定
专家意见
质证
专家辅助人
medical damage
verification
expert opinion
cross-examination
expert auxiliary
