期刊文献+

专用器械在经阴道广泛子宫切除术中的应用价值 被引量:1

Value of special instruments were applied in vaginal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of uterine malignant neoplasm
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的研究自行研制的经阴道广泛子宫切除术(VRH)手术专用器械应用于该术式的效果及价值。方法选择佛山市妇幼保健院2004年3月至2012年8月因宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌行经阴道广泛性子宫切除术联合腹腔镜盆腔淋巴结切除术患者90例为研究对象,随机分为研究组58例(术中使用专用手术器械),对照组32例(术中使用常规手术器械),按类同的方法进行手术,观察手术完成情况,对手术时间、术中出血量、分离输尿管时间、术中术后并发症、术后排气时间、术后恢复自主排尿时间、术后住院时间等指标进行比较。结果研究组VRH手术成功率100%,对照组VRH手术成功率96.88%,1例中转开腹。研究组平均手术时间、平均出血量、分离输尿管时间及术后排气时间均显著少于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),两组术后膀胱功能恢复时间及术后住院时间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。研究组无术中泌尿系统损伤发生,对照组有膀胱损伤1例,输尿管损伤1例。结论 VRH专用器械的使用,有效的降低了经阴道广泛子宫切除术的手术难度,减少了术中、术后并发症的发生,值得推广应用。 Objective To study the value and effect of special instruments used in vaginal radical hysterectomy (VRH). Methods During March of 2004 to August of 2012 ninety patients with cervical cancer or endometrial cancer were se-lected in the Meternal and Children's Hospital of Foshan, were randomly divided into study group and control group. Same procedure of LARVH was applied in 2 groups, but in 58 operations of study group special instruments were used, at the same time just ordinary instruments were used in 32 surgery of control group. Quality index of surgery were evaluated. Re-suits The achievement ratio of study group was 100%, 96. 88% in control group because 1 transferred into laparotomy. The median operative time, blood loss intraoperative, the time used in separating ureter and outgas time of study group were significantly lower than control group ( P 〈 0.01 ). While the time of recovery of bladder function and median length of stay had no obviously difference (P 〉 0. 05 ). One patient injury of bladder and one patient injury of ureter were taken place in control group while no urinary system injury happened in the study group. Conclusions The application of spe-cial instruments in VRH effectively reduce difficulty of operation and decrease intraoperative and postoperative complica- tions, it is valuable to spread and utilize these special instruments.
出处 《中国实用妇科与产科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第2期128-131,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Gynecology and Obstetrics
关键词 经阴道广泛子宫切除术 专用器械 子宫恶性肿瘤 vaginal radical hysterectomy special instruments uterine malignant neoplasm
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1周科辰,姚德生.腹腔镜辅助的阴式根治性子宫切除术治疗宫颈癌效果的Meta分析[J].中国妇幼保健,2010,25(29):4315-4317. 被引量:2
  • 2宋磊.经阴道广泛子宫切除术治疗子宫恶性肿瘤的最新进展[J].实用妇产科杂志,2007,23(1):5-6. 被引量:10
  • 3Michel Roy,Marie Plante.Place of Schauta’s radical vaginal hysterectomy[J].Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology.2010(2)
  • 4G. Mehra,A. Weekes,P. VanTrappen,D. Visvanathan,A. Jeyarajah.Laparoscopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma: Morbidity and long-term follow-up[J].European Journal of Surgical Oncology.2009(3)
  • 5Denis Querleu,C Paul Morrow.Classification of radical hysterectomy[J].Lancet Oncology.2008(3)
  • 6R. SHARMA,J. BAILEY,R. ANDERSON,J. MURDOCH.Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy (Coelio-Schauta): a comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy[J].International Journal of Gynecological Cancer.2006(5)
  • 7K.S. Jackson,N. Das,R. Naik,A.D. Lopes,K.A. Godfrey,M.H. Hatem,J.M. Monaghan.Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs. radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study[J].Gynecologic Oncology.2004(3)

二级参考文献9

  • 1Jadad AR, Moore A, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports randomized clinical trims: Is blinding necessary [J]. Control Clin Trials, 1996, 17 (2): 1.
  • 2Steed H, Rosen B, Murphy J, et al. A comparison of laparascopic assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy and radical abdominal hysteretomy in the treatment of cervical cancer [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2004, 93 (2) : 588.
  • 3Morgan DJ, Hunter DC, McCracken G, et al. Is laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy for cervical carcinoma safe? A case control study with follow - up [J]. BJOG, 2007, 114:537.
  • 4Sharma R, Bailey J. Laparoscopieally assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy ( Coelio - Schauta) : A comparison with open Wertheim/Meigs hysterectomy [J]. Gynecol Cancer, 2006, 16 (6): 1927.
  • 5Jackson KS, Das N, Naik R, et al. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal hysterectomy vs radical abdominal hysterectomy for cervical cancer: a match controlled study [J]. Gynecol Oncol, 2004, 95 (5) : 655.
  • 6Joo HN, Kim JH, Kim DY, et al. Comparative study of laparoscopic - vaginal radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 2004, 92 (1): 277.
  • 7Michel Roy, Marie Plante, Marie - Claude Renaud, et al. Vaginal radi- cal hysterectomy versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of early- stage cervical cancer [J]. Gynecologic Oncology, 1996, 62 (2) : 336.
  • 8Berlanda N, Mezzopane R, Ragusa G, et al. Identifying the indications for laparoseopically assisted[J]. British Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 2000, 11 (7) : 620.
  • 9Malur S, Possover M, Schneider A. Laparoscopically assisted radical vaginal vs radical abdominal hysterectomy type II in patients with cervical cancer [J]. Surg Endosc, 2001, 15 (3) : 289.

共引文献9

同被引文献5

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部