摘要
判决书"附带",尤其是中国基层司法实践中的"法官后语",折射了关于判决书定义、功能,及法官角色和更宏大的司法的理论复杂,需深入辨析。而历史化地理解问题,并引入微观司法需求互动和宏观社会需求互动的概念,可深入洞察其关键,并获得关于判决书"附带"至司法等系列问题的"社会约定"的思考路径。由此推进,重视并积极回应被司法者和广泛司法关注者对司法的愿景,符合司法政治学的正当性理念,亦对中国现代正规司法建设有益。
The appendix to a written judgment, especially a judge＇s supplementary comments, in the prac- tice of grass - root courts in China, refract a series of theoretical issues which may deserve further research, in particular the definition and function of the written judgment, the role of judge and the judicature, etc. Ob- serving from a historical perspective and introducing conceptions of both the micro - interaction of the need of judicature and the macro - interaction of the need of society may make it possible for us to see a crucial point as well as get a new way of speculation on the ＂social consensus＂ to the aforementioned appendix and the other issues of judicature. It will therefore benefit the construction of modem normal judicature in China.
出处
《中国法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期144-159,共16页
China Legal Science
基金
"中国政法大学校级人文社会科学研究项目资助"
编号09ZFG82006
司法部2005年法治建设与法学理论研究部级科研项目重点项目"司法方法与司法公正"(05SFB1002)成果
