期刊文献+

运用德尔菲法研究慢性阻塞性肺病发展“快”、“慢”评价标准问卷的分析 被引量:3

Analysis on "fast" or "slow" evaluation criterion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease development by using Delphi method
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的运用德尔菲法研究慢性阻塞性肺病患者病情发展“快”、“慢”的评价标准。方法在前期流行病学调查、文献研究及临床经验的基础上,面对新疆12个州、市地区的专家进行预调查后,编制第1轮“慢性阻塞性肺病发展快、慢评价标准”专家咨询表。发送给新疆10个州、市的20名专家进行问卷调查、回收及统计分析。结果回收的调查问卷均为有效问卷,回收率为100%,专家积极系数为100%。在发展“快”评价标准的主要指标中,除病程≤10年、肺功能≥II级以外,余项变异系数均〈O.3;次要指标中除急性加重时间≥1个月、6min步行实验1。2级以外,余项变异系数均〈0.3。在发展“慢”评价标准中,主要指标的变异系数均〈0.3。次要指标中除急性加重时间≤1周、6rain步行实验3~4级以外。余项变异系数均〈0.3。结论通过德尔菲法对慢性阻塞性肺病病情发展“快”、“慢”评价标准的指标进行筛选,得到该标准的初步框架,针对个别专家意见不集中的指标,还需进一步研究探讨。 Objective To discuss the "fast" or "slow" evaluation criterion of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease development by Delphi method. Methods On the basis of early epidemiological investigations and literature researches and clinical experiences, the first group of expert advice sheet was prepared for the "fast" or "slow" evaluation criterion of COPD after the pre-survey among the experts in 12 cities and counties of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region. Then the questionnaires were sent to 20 experts in 10 cities and counties of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region and the results were collated for statistical analysis. Results The returned questionnaires were all valid questionnaires, and the returned rate was 100%, the proportion that the experts actively participated was 100%. In the major indexes of evaluation criterion of development "fast", except disease duration 10 years, lung function 〉grade II, all CVs of remain indexes 〈 0.3; and in the secondary indexes, except acute exacerbation period 〉1 1 month, result of 6 min walk test was grade 1-2, all CVs of remain indexes 〈 0.3. In the major indexes of evaluation criterion of development "slow", all CVs 〈 0.3; and in the secondary indexes, except acute exacerbation period 〈 1 week, result of 6 min walk test was grade 3-4, all CVs of remain indexes 〈 0.3. Conclusion The indexes of "fast" or "slow" evaluation criterion of COPD development selected by Delphi method can get a primary framework for this standard. But many experts don't get basically unanimous opinions for some indexes, which should be further studied.
出处 《中国医药导报》 CAS 2013年第6期165-167,共3页 China Medical Herald
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(项目编号:81260590) 新疆维吾尔自治区科技计划项目(项目编号:201233139)
关键词 德尔菲法 慢性阻塞性肺病 发展 Delphi method Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Development
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献24

  • 1汪受传,任现志,赵霞,韩新民.中医药治疗病毒性肺炎疗效评价方法研究设计[J].浙江中医药大学学报,2006,30(2):127-129. 被引量:10
  • 2杨燕,闫慧敏.运脾止泻颗粒治疗小儿腹泻的临床疗效观察[J].中国中西医结合杂志,2006,26(10):899-902. 被引量:9
  • 3张昌敏.德尔菲评价法[A].见曾光主编.现代流行病学方法与应用[C].北京:北京医科大学,中国协和医科大学联合出版社,1994.250-270.
  • 4武书连 吕嘉 郭石林.中国高等教育评估[J].科学学与科学技术管理,1997,:49-73.
  • 5De Gualielmo M,Casolari C,Zanasi,E,et al.Sputum microbial pattern in severe exacerbations of COPD requiring non-invasive mechanical ventilation.Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s312.
  • 6Erkan L,Uzun O,Katar D,et al.Infective etiology of acute exacerbation of COPD (AECOPD).Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s512.
  • 7Lapteva IM,Lapteva EA,and Korovkin VS.Lung function and bacterial pathogens in sputum of patients with acute exacerbation of COPD.Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s408.
  • 8Caparoska TB,Kneva BA,Gerovski BA,et al.Infectious exacerbations of COPD - connections between bacteriology and respiratory function.Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s411.
  • 9Wilkinson T,Powrie D,Wilks M,et al.Differential inflammatory effects of colonising airway bacteria in COPD.Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s686.
  • 10Powrie DJ,Wilkinson TM,Donaldson GC,et al.Chronic sputum production in COPD is a marker for airway inflammation and colonization.Eur Respir J,2004,24(suppl 48):s306.

共引文献310

同被引文献12

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部