期刊文献+

腹腔镜与开腹手术在结直肠癌治疗中的临床分析 被引量:24

Clinical analysis of laparoscopic and open surgery in the treatment of colorectal cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价腹腔镜在结直肠癌根治术中的安全性,并与传统开腹手术就手术效果、术后临床恢复等情况进行对比研究。方法分析既往诊治的非转移性结直肠癌患者131例,其中选择腹腔镜下结直肠癌根治术的患者(LCS组)共53例,同期开腹结直肠癌根治术患者(OCS组)78例,详细收集每例患者的数据资料。就两组手术操作的安全性、术后肿瘤学效果以及恢复等进行对比分析。结果两组相比较,在手术时间、术中出血、淋巴结清扫个数、瘤体远切端距离及术后并发症发生率方面均无统计学差异(P>0.05);而在切口长度、术后恢复时间以及术后住院时间上具有显著性差异(P<0.05)。结论运用腹腔镜技术行结直肠癌根治术,具有操作安全、创伤小、恢复快等特点,不仅技术上可行,而且可达到与开腹根治术相近的效果,是临床中可供选择应用的治疗手段。 Objective To evaluate the safety of laparoscopic radical on colorectal cancer patients,and compare the effects and postoperative recovery with traditional open surgery.Methods The clinical data of 131 patients with colorectal cancer received operation in this hospital were retrospectively analyzed.All these patients were divided into two groups,namely laparoscopic colorectal surgery group(LCS group,n=53) and open colorectal surgery group(OCS group,n=78).The safety of surgical procedures,postoperative oncological effect and recovery were compared between these two groups.Results There was no significant difference between these two groups with regard to operating time,intraoperative blood loss,number of lymph nodes resected and rate of postoperative complications(P0.05).However there was significant difference between these two groups with regard to length of incision,time for postoperative recovery and duration of hospitalization(P0.05).Conclusion Laparoscopic techniques for colorectal cancer surgery is safe,minimally invasive and quick recovery.It can achieve the similar radical effect versus open surgery,and it is a choice for colorectal cancer patients in clinic.
出处 《临床和实验医学杂志》 2013年第3期201-203,共3页 Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine
关键词 结直肠癌 根治术 腹腔镜手术 开腹手术 Colorectal cancer Radical resection Laparoscopic surgery Open surgery
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献21

  • 1M. J. Curet,K. Putrakul,D. E. Pitcher,R. K. Josloff,K. A. Zucker.Laparoscopically assisted colon resection for colon carcinoma[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 2000 (11)
  • 2W. Schwenk,B. B?hm,J. M. Müller.Postoperative pain and fatigue after laparoscopic or conventional colorectal resections[J]. Surgical Endoscopy . 1998 (9)
  • 3Stage JG,Schulze S,M-ller P,Overgaard H,Andersen M,Rebsdorf-Pedersen VB,Nielsen HJ.Prospective randomized study of laparoscopic versus open colonic resection for adenocarcinoma. British Journal of Surgery . 1997
  • 4Buunen M,Veldkamp R,Hop WC,Kuhry E,Jeekel J,Haglind E,P-hlman L,Cuesta MA,Msika S,Morino M,Lacy A,Bonjer HJ.Survival after laparoscopic surgery versus open surgery for colon cancer:long-term outcome of a randomised clinical trial. The Lancet Oncology . 2009
  • 5Lacy AM,Delgado S,Castells A,Prins HA,Arroyo V,Ibarzabal A,Pique JM.The long-term results of a randomized clinical trial of laparoscopy-assisted versus open surgery for colon cancer. Annals of Surgery . 2008
  • 6Schwenk W,Haase O,Neudecker J,Müller JM.Short term benefits for laparoscopic colorectal resection. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews . 2005
  • 7Bonjer HJ,Hop WC,Nelson H,Sargent DJ,Lacy AM,Castells A,Guillou PJ,Thorpe H,Brown J,Delgado S,Kuhrij E,Haglind E,P-hlman L.Laparoscopically assisted vs open colectomy for colon cancer:a meta-analysis. Archives of Surgery . 2007
  • 8Kuhry E,Schwenk W,Gaupset R,Romild U,Bonjer J.Longterm outcome of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer:a cochrane systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Cancer Treatment Reviews . 2008
  • 9J Fleshman,DJ Sargent,E Green,M Anvari,SJ Stryker,RW Beart,M Hellinger,R Flanagan,W Peters,H Nelson.Laparoscopic colectomy for cancer is not inferior to open surgery based on 5-year data from the COST Study Trial Group. Annals of Surgery . 2007
  • 10Cooperman,AM,Katz,V,Zimmon,D,Botero,G.Laparoscopic colon resection: a case report. Journal of Laparoendoscopic Surgery . 1991

共引文献12

同被引文献169

引证文献24

二级引证文献155

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部