摘要
2012年修改并通过的《刑事诉讼法》和《民事诉讼法》已于今年1月1日实施。两大新诉讼法对证据制度,包括证据种类、证明标准等内容进行了重大改革。其中,对于司法实践中证据地位凸显的鉴定意见,两大诉讼法也做了调整,包括完善鉴定人出庭制度、专家辅助人制度、鉴定人保护、鉴定人选任等。但因两大诉讼法性质不同,新刑诉法和新民诉法对相关内容做了不同规定,对于其是否符合立法统一性、是否具有合理性、是否与其诉讼性质相一致,有必要从法学理论角度层面予以释明与检视。
The amended Criminal Procedure Law and Civil Procedure Law will come into force on January 1,2013.The two procedure laws have significant changes in the evidence system,including the type of evidence,the proof standard,and so on.The two procedure laws have made adjustments regarding appraisal opinions,which is more and more important in judicial practice.The adjustments include the system for appraisers to appear in court,the system for expert assistants,the protection of appraisers,the selection of appraisers,and etc.However,since the nature of the two procedure laws is different,they have different regulations.We need to look at the legislative unity,rationality,and the nature of their consistency with the proceedings from the perspective of jurisprudence.
出处
《中国司法鉴定》
2013年第1期1-7,共7页
Chinese Journal of Forensic Sciences
关键词
司法鉴定立法
新《刑事诉讼法》
新《民事诉讼法》
法理研判
forensic appraisal legislation
New Criminal Procedure Law
New Civil Procedure Law
jurisprudencial research
