摘要
对"实践是检验真理的唯一标准"这一判断的理解,一直就存有分歧。可以认为,该判断从形式逻辑上讲就是实践、真理、标准、检验等四个范畴之间的关系,是真判断。在"检验真理"这一特定语境中,如果这一判断可以简化为"实践是(唯一)标准",且"实践是人类特有的活动"、"标准是先在物";那么,从逻辑上不难得出"实践是先在物",这与"实践是人类特有的活动"的大前提相矛盾。可见,应该做"实践是检验真理的唯一手段"的内涵回归性理解。
As to the judgment of ＂practice is the sole criterion for testing truth＂, there have long been different opinions. The author of this paper maintains that logically, the judgment, which just involves the relationships be- tween practice, truth, criteria and categories, is a true one. If the judgment in the specific context of ＂testing truth＂ can be simplified into ＂practice is the （sole） criterion＂, ＂practice is a kind of human-specific activity＂, and ＂crite- ria are pre-existent objects＂, then, logically, the conclusion can be reached that ＂practice is a pre-existent ob- ject＂, which runs counter to the logical proposition that ＂practice is a kind of human-specific activity＂. Therefore, it is necessary to return to the content or the connotations with a view to understanding ＂practice is the sole criteri- on for testing truth＂.
出处
《常熟理工学院学报》
2012年第11期30-32,共3页
Journal of Changshu Institute of Technology
关键词
实践
标准
手段
内涵回归
practice
criteria
means
returning to the content
