期刊文献+

后腹腔镜切开取石和mPCNL治疗输尿管上段结石的对比研究

Comparison of two mini-invasive surgical procedures for upper ureteral calculi
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的比较后腹腔镜输尿管切开取石和经皮微穿刺碎石术(mPCNL)治疗输尿管上段结石的疗效。方法 43例输尿管上段结石的患者接受治疗,其中腹腔镜组20例,mPCNL组23例。结果术后1周复查尿路平片,后腹腔镜组结石清除率100%,mPCNL组91.6%。结论 2种方法治疗输尿管上段结石均能取得满意疗效,当结石位于L3以上时mPCNL疗效较好,而后腹腔镜切开取石治疗L3~L5上缘的结石则可能效果更好。 Objective To compare the effects of minimal invasive percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) and retroperitoneal lapa- roscopic ureterolithotomy in management of upper ureteral calculi. Methods Forty - three patients with upper ureteral stone were enrolled in the study. Twenty cases were treated by netroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy and 23 by mPCNL. Results In mPCNL group, the stone -free rate was 91.6% one week after operation; in retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy, that was 100%. Conclusion High stone -free rate can be obtained by two methods, mPCNL could be an effective surgical procedure for treatment of upper ureteral calculi( 〉 L3) ; retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy is a selective method of minimal trauma for the treatment of ureteral calculi (L3 - L5 ), or bigger stones.
出处 《安徽医学》 2012年第12期1599-1600,共2页 Anhui Medical Journal
关键词 输尿管结石 后腹腔镜切开取石 经皮微穿刺碎石术 Ureteral calculi Retroperitoneal laparoscopic ureterolithotomy Percutaneous nephrolithotomy
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献51

共引文献227

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部