期刊文献+

显性与隐性激励下的电信业务创新的共赢合同设计 被引量:2

A Win-Win Contract on the Combination of Explicit and Implicit Incentives in Telecom Business Innovation
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文基于经典的委托代理框架,用体现共赢的价值偏好参数(描述委托人关心自己与他人的程度)修改了委托人(运营商)的目标函数,并在代理人(服务提供商)的效用函数中引入隐性激励要素,集中考察了运营商与服务提供商之间显性与隐性激励相结合的业务创新合同设计问题,进而分析了价值偏好参数、隐性激励的边际产出系数以及创新投入的外部性产出系数对合同参数、业绩以及代理成本的影响。结果表明:价值偏好参数可以协调各利益主体间的价值关系并有效控制代理成本,而隐性激励的边际产出系数以及创新投入的外部性产出系数则对显性激励结构具有重要影响。 Based on the classical principal-agent framework, this paper improves the principle' s objective function, and puts the implicit incentive element into the agent' s utility function. Then, in combination of traits of the telecom indus- try, it investigates intensively the combinative incentive and win-win contract design between a telecom operator and a service provider, and it further explores the influences of value preference, implicit incentive coefficient, and external output coefficient of innovation input on contract parameters, performances and agency cost. Results show that the value preference parameter can coordinate the benefits between cooperators and control agency costs effectively, both implicit incentive coefficient and external output coefficient of innovation input have an important influence on explicit incentive structure.
出处 《预测》 CSSCI 北大核心 2013年第1期67-71,共5页 Forecasting
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(71202074) 中央高校基本科研业务费资助项目(ZYGX2010J130)
关键词 电信业务创新 显性激励 隐性激励 共赢合同 telecom business innovation explicit incentives implicit incentives win-win contracts
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

二级参考文献65

共引文献161

同被引文献26

  • 1胡婉丽,汤书昆,胡长颂.合作创新三阶段博弈模型——合作程度对RJV的影响分析[J].运筹与管理,2004,13(5):71-75. 被引量:17
  • 2施涛.移动增值服务创新激励分析[J].科技管理研究,2007,27(9):28-30. 被引量:3
  • 3George G, Zahra S A, Wood D R. The effects of bus- iness - university alliances on innovative output and financial performance: a study of publicly traded bio- technology companies[J]. Journal of Business Ventu- ring, 2002, 17(6): 577-609.
  • 4Noordhoff C S, Kyriakopoulos K, Moorman C, et al. The bright side and dark side of embedded ties in busi- ness-to-business innovation[J]. Journal of Marketing, 2011, 75(5): 34-52.
  • 5Schaarschmidt M, Kilian T. Impediments to customer integration into the innovation process: A case study in the telecommunications industry[J]. European Management Journal, 2014, 32(2): 350-361.
  • 6Battistella C, Colucci K, De Toni A F, et al. Method- ology of business ecosystems network analysis: A case study in Telecom Italia Future Centre[J]. Technologi- cal Forecasting and Social Change, 2013, 80 (6) : 1194-1210.
  • 7Abu S T. Competition and innovation in telecom sec- tor: empirical evidence from OECD countries[J]. In- formatica Economica, 2014, 18(1) : 27-39.
  • 8Ghezzi A, Cortimiglia M N, Frank A G. Strategy and business model design in dynamic telecommuni- cations industries: A study on Italian mobile network operators[J]. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 2015, 90: 346-354.
  • 9Jiang L, Mei S, Zhong W. Effects of Quality Im- provement in a Mobile Value Chain with Duopoly MNOs [M]//LISS 2012. Springer Berlin Heidel- berg, 2013.. 845-852.
  • 10刘国亮,范云翠.基于合作研发与推广的运营商与终端厂商的双边激励研究[J].科技进步与对策,2010,27(2):8-11. 被引量:5

引证文献2

二级引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部