摘要
目的探讨中西医结合治疗颈性眩晕内科方案,评估临床疗效。方法将170例确诊为颈性眩晕的患者随机分为中西医结合(颈复汤低、中、高剂量分别联合西药倍他司汀)组,中药颈复汤中剂量组,西药倍他司汀对照组,共计5组,每组34例,疗程1周。临床观察指标:DHI眩晕障碍评分量表,眩晕缓解天数量表,症状视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)。结果治疗后中西医结合三组DHI眩晕障碍评分量表、眩晕缓解天数量表、症状积分比较均较中药对照组有统计学意义(P<0.05);低、中、高剂量三组间比较有统计学意义(P<0.05);中、高剂量组DHI眩晕障碍评分量表与症状积分较西药对照组有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论中西医结合治疗方案优于单纯中药组和单纯西药组;中、高剂量组疗效优于低剂量组。中西医结合治疗颈性眩晕更有优势,是有效、安全、科学、规范、便捷、经济的内科综合诊疗方案。
Objective To study the internal medical regimen for treatment of cervical vertigo by integrative medicine. Methods One hundred and seventy patients with cervical vertigo were randomly assigned to integrative medicine group （treated by betahistine and Jingfu decoction with low, medium and high dose）, Jingfu decoction group, and betahistine group. DHI vertigo disorder evalua- tion scale,stun mitigation day scale, symptoms of visual analog score （VAS） were observed. Results The therapeutic effects evaluated by DHI vertigo disorder evaluation scale, stun mitigation day scale, symptoms of VAS score in integrative medicine group was better than that in neck complex soup and betahistine group （P〈0. 05）. The therapeutic effect in low,medium and high dose of integrative medicine group were differences significantly （P〈0.05）. The therapeutic effect evaluated by DI-II vertigo disorder evaluation scale and symptoms of VAS score in medium and high close group of integrative medicine group were better than that in betahistine group. Conclusion Therapeutic effect of integrative medicine for treatment of cervical vertigo was superior to that of simple medicines.
出处
《中西医结合心脑血管病杂志》
2013年第1期7-9,共3页
Chinese Journal of Integrative Medicine on Cardio-Cerebrovascular Disease
基金
上海市科委中药现代化专项基金资助(No.10DZ1974500)
关键词
颈性眩晕
颈复汤
中西医结合方案
cervical vertigo
Jingfu decoction
internal medical regimen
