期刊文献+

巴替非班在急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中的应用价值 被引量:4

The effects of batifiban during percutaneous coronary intervention in acute coronary syndrome patients
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的探讨巴替非班在非ST段抬高型急性冠脉综合征(ACS)患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗中应用的临床疗效。方法择期行经皮冠状动脉介入术的ACS患者66例,随机分为巴替非班组(n=34)和安慰剂组(n=32),其中巴替非班组脱落/剔除5例,安慰剂组脱落/剔除8例。2组术中及术后24 h分别采用巴替非班或安慰剂治疗。观察2组术后慢血流发生率与支架植入后冠脉血流TIMI分级。观察2组术后2 d、30 d内心血管事件(MACE)发生情况。结果 2组患者基线资料相当(P>0.05),术后均未发生即刻慢血流事件,TIMI分级均为3级,2组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2组在术后2 d、30 d内均无MACE事件发生。2组术后2d内出血事件、不良反应比较无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论巴替非班在非ST段抬高型ACS患者经皮冠状动脉介入术中及术后应用,疗效肯定,安全性好。 Objective To observe the clinical effect and safety of batifiban in non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome(ACS)patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention(PCI).Methods A total of 66 non-ST segment elevation ACS patients receiving PCI were included and randomized into batifiban group(n=34)and placebo group (n=32).There were 5 and 8 missing/excluded patients in group batifiban and placebo,respectively.The major adverse cardiac events(MACE)include refractory ischemia,new myocardial infarction and death,cerebral apoplexy and hemorrhage complication were observed.Results The baseline data of the two groups were not significantly different(P 0.05).The MACE at 30 days was not significantly different between two groups(P 0.05).There were no differences in the incidence of bleeding or platelet decrease between two groups.There was no coronary slow flow phenomenon in two groups.Conclusion Compared with placebo group,using batifiban in non-ST segment elevation ACS patients is safe and effect during PCI procedures.
出处 《疑难病杂志》 CAS 2013年第1期10-12,共3页 Chinese Journal of Difficult and Complicated Cases
基金 国家自然科学基金(No.81000130 81000091) 北京市卫生局青年科学研究资助项目(No.QN2010-010)
关键词 急性冠脉综合征 非ST段抬高 巴替非班 经皮冠状动脉介入术 Acute coronary syndrome non-ST segment elevation Batifiban Percutaneous coronary intervention
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献49

共引文献38

同被引文献46

  • 1Isabell Bernlochner,Katharina Mayer,Tanja Morath,Siegmund Braun,Stefanie Schulz,Albert Sch?mig,Werner Koch,Adnan Kastrati,Dirk Sibbing.??High frequency of CYP2C19*2 carriers in PCI-treated patients switched over from clopidogrel to prasugrel based on platelet function monitoring(J)Platelets . 2012 (6)
  • 2Gilles Montalescot,Jean-Philippe Collet,Patrick Ecollan,Leonardo Bolognese,Jurrien ten Berg,Dariusz Dudek,Christian Hamm,Petr Widimsky,Jean-Fran?ois Tanguay,Patrick Goldstein,Eileen Brown,Debra L. Miller,LeRoy LeNarz,Eric Vicaut.??Effect of Prasugrel Pre-Treatment Strategy in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for NSTEMI(J)Journal of the American College of Cardiology . 2014 (24)
  • 3Dimitrios Alexopoulos.??Reloading patients chronically treated with P2Y12 inhibitors and presenting with ACS/PCI: Facing a crossroad?(J)International Journal of Cardiology . 2013 (1)
  • 4Olson WH,Ma YW,Crivera C,et al.Economic outcomes with prasugrel versus clopidogrel in acute coronary syndrome patients:observations from prasugrel users and matched clopidogrel users. J Med Econ . 2015
  • 5Zhou BD,Zu LY,Mi L,et al.An analysis of patients receiving emergency CAG without PCI and the value of GRACE score in predicting PCI possibilities in NSTE-ACS patients. J Geriatr Cardiol . 2015
  • 6Verdoia M,Barbieri L,Suryapranata H,et al.Switching from Clopidogrel to Prasugrel in patients undergoing PCI:A meta-analytic overview. Platelets . 2015
  • 7Ponniah JP,Shamsul AS,Adam BM.Predictors of mortality in patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS)undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI):Insights from National Cardiovascular Disease Database (NCVD),Malaysia. Medical Journal of Malaysia . 2012
  • 8Levine GN,Jeong YH,Goto S,et al.World Heart Federation expert consensus statement on antiplatelet therapy in East Asian patients with ACS or undergoing PCI. Nat Rev Cardiol . 2014
  • 9Saito S,Isshiki T,Kimura T,Ogawa H,Yokoi H,Nanto S,Takayama M,Kitagawa K,Nishikawa M,Miyazaki S,Nakamura M.Efficacy and safety of adjusted-dose prasugrel compared with clopidogrel in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome:the PRASFIT-ACS study. Circulation Journal . 2014
  • 10Uwe Zeymer,Hans-Christian Mochmann,Bernd Mark,et al.Double-blind,randomized,prospective comparison of loading doses of 600 mg Clopidogrel versus 60 mg Prasugrel in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction scheduled for primary percutaneous intervention:the ETAMI trial (early thienopyr. JACC:Cardiovascular Interventions . 2015

二级引证文献19

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部