期刊文献+

亚砷酸钠对HaCaT细胞MGMT基因启动子区甲基化CpG结合蛋白-2、DNA甲基转移酶1、组蛋白去乙酰化酶-1结合的影响 被引量:1

The effect of NaAsO2 on the binding of methyl CpG binding protein 2, DNA methyltransferase 1 and histone deacetylase 1 to the promoter of MGMT gene in HaCaT cells
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察亚砷酸钠(NaAsO:)对人肤角质形成细胞株(HaCaT细胞)MGMT基因启动子区甲基化CpG结合蛋白-2(MeCP2)、DNA甲基转移酶1(DNMTl)及组蛋白去乙酰化酶1(HDACl)结合情况的影响,为深化阐释砷毒作用机制提供依据。方法分别以0.00(空白对照)、3.13、6,25、12.50、25.00μmol/LNaAs02重复间隔处理HaCaT细胞72h(NaAs02处理24h,隔天再次相同处理,重复3次),以人表皮鳞癌细胞株(A431)作为阳性对照。定量染色质免疫共沉淀技术(Q—CHIP)检测MGMT基因转录调控区CHIPl、CHIP2区域及MGMT基因编码区ChIP3区域MeCP2、DNMTl、HDACl结合情况。结果各组HaCaT细胞MGMT基因转录调控区CHIPl、CHIP2区域MeCP2、DNMTl、HDACl蛋白结合水平比较,差异有统计学意义(F值分别为7.387、84.634、78.442和19.263、69.649、26.546,P均〈0.05);其中各N以s02处理组CHIPl、CHIP2区域MeCI〉2、DNMTl、HDACl蛋白结合水平[3.13μmol/LNaAs02处理组:(136.00±16.97)%、(145.00±2.83)%、(88.50±19.09)%和(106.50±37.48)%、(112.34±8.73)%、(59.71±8.49)%;6.25μmol/LNaAs02处理组:(130.00±42.43)%、(154.50士4.95)%、(101.00±1.27)%和(88.50±3.54)%、(134.32±2.82)%、(102.75±19.91)%;12.50~mol/LNaAs02处理组:(141.50±23.33)%、(161.50±7.78)%、(125.00±U.31)%和(119.50±24.75)%、(171.59±3.54)%、(167.61±10.61)%;25,00μmol/LNaAs02处理组:(134.50±43.13)%、(472.50±50.20)%、(383.50±30.41)%和(180.09±12.73)%、(348.50±27.58)%、(158.45±12.02)%]均高于空白对照组[(51.50±9.19)%、(82.00±12.73)%、(25.03±2.91)%和(37.02±4.24)%、(91.56±26.16)%、(19.09±2.90)%,P均〈0.05]。各组HaCaT细胞MGMT基因编码区CHIP3区域MeCP2蛋白结合水平比较,差异无统计学意义(F=1.670,P〉0.05),而DNMTl、HDACl蛋白结合水平比较,差异有统计学意义(F值分别为4.404、9.863,P均〈0.05),其中25.00I,Lmol/LNaAs02处理组DNMTl、HDACl蛋白结合水平[(615.85±29.63)%、(306.09±59.40)%]与空白对照组[(99.70±12.02)%、(92.45,±48.79)%]比较,差异有统计学意义(P均〈0.05)。结论MeCP2可结合于砷所致高甲基化MGMT基因转录调控区。通过招募DNMTl及HDACl使组蛋白去乙酰化,同时DNMTl可结合于MGMT基因编码区,以非甲基化DNA结合蛋白(IVIBD)依赖的方式招募HDACl,通过染色质重塑方式导致MGMT基因沉默,可能是砷毒性表现的早期分子事件。 Objective To investigate the effect of NaAsO2 on the binding levels of methyl CpG binding protein 2(MeCP2), DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) and histone deacetylase 1 (HDAC1) to the hypermethylation promoter region of MGMT gene in HaCaT cells, in order to provide a basis to deepen the interpretation of the role of arsenic poisoning mechanism. Methods HaCaT cells were treated repeatedly and interval with different concentrations of NaAsO2 (3.13, 6.25, 12.50, 25.00 ±mol/L, respectively) for 72 h. Untreated HaCaT was used as blank control group and human epidermal squamous carcinoma cell line (A431 cells) as positive control group. The binding levels to the two transcription regulatory regions(ChiP1, CHIP2) and to the coding region(ChiP3) of MGMT gene were detected by chromatin immuno-precipitation combined with quantitative PCR. Results The differences of binding levels of MeCP2, DNMT1 and HDAC1 to CHIP1 and CHIP2 in each group were significant (F = 7.387, 84.634, 78.442 and 19.263, 69.649, 26.546, all P 〈 0.05). The binding levels of MeCP2, DNMT1 and HDAC1 to CHIP1 and CHIP2 in each NaAsO2 exposed group [3.13 p±mol/L NaAsO2 exposed group: (136.00 ± 16.97)%, (145.00 ±. 2.83)%, (88.50 ± 19.09)% and (106.50 ± 37.48)%, (112.34 ± 8.73)%, (59.71 ± 8.49)%; 6.25 p±mol/L NaAsO2 exposed group: (130.00 ± 42.43)%, (154.50 ± 4.95)%, (101.00 ± 1.27)% and (88.50 ± 3.54)%, (134.32 ± 2.82)%, (102.75 ± 19.91)%; 12.50 I±mol/L NaAsO2 exposed group: (141.50 ±.23.33)%, ( 161.50 ± 7.78)%, (125.00 ± 11.31 )% and ( 119.50 ± 24.75)%, (171.59 ± 3.54)%, ( 167.61 ± 10.61 )% ; 25.00 ±mol/L NaAsO2 exposed group: (134.50 ± 43.13)%, (472.50 ± 50.20)%, (383.50 ± 30.41)% and (180.09 ± 12.73)%, (348.50 ± 27.58)%, (158.45 ± 12.02)%] were higher than that in the blank control group[(51.50 + 9.19)%, (82.00 ± 12.73)%, (25.03 ± 2.91)% and (37.02 ± 4.24)%, (91.56 ± 26.16)%, (19.09 ± 2.90)%, all P 〈 0.05]. The differences of binding levels of MeCP2 to CHIP3 in each group were not significant(F = 1.670, P 〉 0.05), but the differences of binding levels of DNMT1 and HDAC1 to CHIP3 were significant(F= 4.404, 9.863, all P 〈 0.05), and only the binding levels in the 25.00 p±mol/L NaAsO2 exposed group [ (615.85 ± 29.63)%, (306.09 ± 59.40)%] were higher than that in the blank control group[(99.70 ± 12.02)%, (92.45 ± 48.79)%, all P 〈 0.05 ]. Conclusions MeCP2 can bind to the methylated MGMT gene transcriptional regulatory regions which are induced by arsenic and leads to histone deacetylation by the recruitment of DNMT1 and HDAC1 and, meanwhile, DNMT1 can bind to the coding region of MGMT gene to recruit HDAC1 in a methyl DNA binding protein( MBD ) independence manner and media MGMT gene silencing through the chromatin remodeling way, which might be the early molecular events of arsenic poisoning.
出处 《中华地方病学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期16-20,共5页 Chinese Journal of Endemiology
基金 国家自然科学基金(30960337、81172603) 贵州省重大专项基金(黔科合重大专项字[2006]6016号) 贵州省科学技术基金(黔科合J字[2009]2188号)
关键词 砷中毒 基因 O(6)-甲基鸟嘌呤DNA转移酶 甲基-CpG-结合蛋白2 DNA(胞嘧啶-5-)-甲基转移酶 组蛋白脱乙酰基酶类 Arsenic poisoning Genes, 0 (6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase Methyl-CpG-binding protein 2 DNA ( Cytosine-5 - )-methyltransferase Histone deacetylases
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Stevens JJ,Graham B,Walker AM. The effects of arsenic trioxide on DNA synthesis and genotoxicity in human colon cancer cells[J].INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH,2010,(05):2018-2032.
  • 2Chanda S,Dasgupta UB,Guhamazumder D. DNA hypermethylation of promoter of gene p53 and p16 in arsenicexposed people with and without malignancy[J].Toxicological Sciences,2006,(02):431-437.doi:10.1093/toxsci/kfj030.
  • 3Salnikow K,Zhitkovich A. Genetic and epigenetic mechanisms in metal carcinogenesis and cocarcinogenesis:nickel,arsenic,and chromium[J].Chemical Research in Toxicology,2008,(01):28-44.doi:10.1021/tx700198a.
  • 4Osley MA. Regulation of histone H2A and H2B ubiquitylation[J].Brief Funct G enomic Proteomic,2006,(03):179-189.
  • 5Vaissière T,Hung RJ,Zaridze D. Quantitative analysis of DNA methylation profiles in lung cancer identifies aberrant DNA methylation of specific genes and its association with gender and cancer risk factors[J].Cancer Research,2009,(01):243-252.doi:10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-08-2489.
  • 6Bogdanovi(c) O,Veenstra GJ. DNA methylation and methyl-CpG binding proteins:developmental requirements and function[J].Chromosoma,2009,(05):549-565.doi:10.1007/s00412-009-0221-9.
  • 7潘雪莉,张爱华,黄晓欣.燃煤污染型砷中毒人群MGMT基因甲基化、转录及表达的研究[J].环境与健康杂志,2010,27(4):283-287. 被引量:11
  • 8潘雪莉,张爱华.亚砷酸钠对HaCaT细胞MGMT基因甲基化和mRNA及蛋白表达水平的影响[J].中国地方病学杂志,2011,30(3):273-278. 被引量:7
  • 9潘雪莉,张爱华.亚砷酸钠对人皮肤角质形成细胞MGMT基因组蛋白乙酰化及转录与表达的影响[J].环境与职业医学,2011,28(4):210-214. 被引量:4
  • 10Senese S,Zaragoza K,Minardi S. Role for histone deacetylase 1 in human tumor cell proliferation[J].Molecular and Cellular Biology,2007,(13):4784-4795.doi:10.1128/MCB.00494-07.

二级参考文献46

  • 1卢光明,乌正赉,姚孝元,张世英,李振龙,白介本,蔡庆,张文.p16基因甲基化与地方性砷中毒发病关系的条件logistic回归分析[J].中国地方病学杂志,2004,23(4):321-324. 被引量:9
  • 2潘雪莉,张爱华,黄晓欣,蒋宪瑶.p16基因突变及甲基化在砷致癌中的作用[J].中国地方病学杂志,2005,24(2):127-129. 被引量:16
  • 3孙殿军,高彦辉,于光前.中国“十一五”地方性砷中毒主要防治与研究任务的探析[J].中国地方病学杂志,2006,25(1):3-5. 被引量:40
  • 4陈立军,王玮,于利人,倪虹,呼文亮.亚硫酸氢盐-基因组测序法在检测基因异常甲基化中的应用[J].中国肿瘤临床,2006,33(22):1280-1283. 被引量:2
  • 5薛京伦.表观遗传学-原理、技术与实践[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2008:169-175.
  • 6Reichard JF, Schnekenburger M , Pugal A. Long term low-dose arsenic exposure induces loss of DNA methylation [J]. Biochem Biophys Res Commun, 2007, 352: 188-192.
  • 7Chanda S, Dasgupta UB. DNA hypermethylation of promoter of gene p53 and p16 in arsenic-exposed people with and without malignancy [J].Toxicological Sciences, 2006,89:431-437.
  • 8Zhang AH, Bin HH, Pan XL, et al. Analysis of p16 gene mutation, deletion and methylation in patients with arseniasis caused by indoor unventilated-stove coal usage in Guizhou, China [J].J Toxieol Environ Health A ,2007,70: 970-975.
  • 9Shamsara S, Sharif S, Afsharnezhad S, et al. Association between MGMT promoter hypermethylation and p53 mutation in glioblastoma [J }.Cancer Invest, 2009,27: 825-829.
  • 10Yamagata Y, Asada H, Tamura L, et al. DNA methyltransferase expression in the human endometrium: down-regulation by progesterone and estrogen [J ].Hum Reprod, 2009, 24:1126 - 1132.

共引文献17

同被引文献21

  • 1宾海华,张爱华,黄晓欣,潘雪莉,洪峰,蒋宪瑶.燃煤型砷中毒患者p16基因缺失及启动区CpG岛甲基化的观察[J].中国地方病学杂志,2006,25(4):370-373. 被引量:5
  • 2杨大平,张爱华,李军,王松,黄晓欣,陈宁,何云.燃煤型砷中毒患者肝损伤的临床病理研究[J].贵州医药,2007,31(11):982-983. 被引量:5
  • 3Hughes MF, Beck BD, Chen Y, et al. Arsenic exposure and toxicology: a historical perspective[J]. Toxicol Sci,2011,123(2): 305-332. DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfr 184.
  • 4Barrel DP. MicroRNAs: genomics, biogenesis, mechanism, and function[J]. Ce11,2004,116(2):281-297. DOI:10.1016/S0092-8674 (04)00045-5.
  • 5Nye MD, Fry RC, Hoyo C, et al. Investigating Epigenetic Effects of Prenatal Exposure to Toxic Metals in Newborns: Challenges and Benefits[J]. Med Epigenet,2014,2(1):53-59. DOI: 10.1159/ 000362336.
  • 6Ren X, McHale CM, Skibola CF, et al. An emerging role for epigenetic dysregulation in arsenic toxicity and carcinogenesis[J]. Environ Health Perspect,2011,119(1):ll-19. DOI:10.1289/ehp. 1002114.
  • 7Brew K, Nagase H. The tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMPs): an ancient f amily with structural and functional diversity[J]. Biochim Biophys Acta,2010,1803 ( 1 ) : 55 - 71. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbamcr.2010.01.003.
  • 8Nagpal N, Kulshreshtha R. miR-191: an emerging player in disease biology[J]. Front Genet,2014,5:99. DOI:10.3389/fgene. 2014.00099.
  • 9Defamie V, Sanchez O, Murthy A, et al. TIMP3 controls cell fate to confer hepatocellular carcinoma resistance[J]. Oncogene,2015, 34(31):4098-4108. DOI: 10.1038/onc.2014.339.
  • 10Ren X, Gaile DP, Gong Z, et al. Arsenic responsive microRNAs in vivo and their potential involvement in arsenic-induced oxidative stress[J]. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol,2015,283(3):198-209. DOI:I0.1016/j.taap.2015.01.014.

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部