期刊文献+

Stress evolution and failure process of Brazilian disc under impact 被引量:7

Stress evolution and failure process of Brazilian disc under impact
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 To reveal stress distribution and crack propagation of Brazilian discs under impact loads, dynamic tests were conducted with SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) device. Stress states of specimens were monitored with strain gauges on specimen surface and SHPB bars. The failure process of specimen was recorded by ultra speed camera FASTCAM SAI.1 (675 000 fps). Stress histories from strain gauges offer comprehensive information to evaluate the stress equilibrium of specimen in time and space. When a slowly rising load (with loading rates less than 1 200 N/s for d 50 mm bar) is applied, there is usually good stress equilibrium in specimen. The stress distribution after equilibrium is similar to its static counterpart. And the first crack initiates at the disc center and propagates along the load direction. But with the front of incident wave becoming steep, it is hard for specimens to get to stress equilibrium. The first crack may appear anywhere on the specimen together with multiple randomly distributed secondary cracks. For a valid dynamic Brazil test with stress equilibrium, the specimen will break into two halves neatly. While for tests with stress disequilibrium, missing strap may be found when broken halves of specimens are put together. For those specimens broken up neatly at center but having missing wedges at the loading areas, it is usually subjected to local buckling from SHPB bars. To reveal stress distribution and crack propagation of Brazilian discs under impact loads, dynamic tests were conducted with SHPB (split Hopkinson pressure bar) device. Stress states of specimens were monitored with strain gauges on specimen surface and SHPB bars. The failure process of specimen was recorded by ultra speed camera FASTCAM SA1.1 (675 000 fps). Stress histories from strain gauges offer comprehensive information to evaluate the stress equilibrium of specimen in time and space. When a slowly rising load (with loading rates less than 1 200 N/s for d 50 mm bar) is applied, there is usually good stress equilibrium in specimen. The stress distribution after equilibrium is similar to its static counterpart. And the first crack initiates at the disc center and propagates along the load direction. But with the front of incident wave becoming steep, it is hard for specimens to get to stress equilibrium. The first crack may appear anywhere on the specimen together with multiple randomly distributed secondary cracks. For a valid dynamic Brazil test with stress equilibrium, the specimen will break into two halves neatly. While for tests with stress disequilibrium, missing strap may be found when broken halves of specimens are put together. For those specimens broken up neatly at center but having missing wedges at the loading areas, it is usually subjected to local buckling from SHPB bars.
出处 《Journal of Central South University》 SCIE EI CAS 2013年第1期172-177,共6页 中南大学学报(英文版)
基金 Projects(50904079, 51274254, 50934006) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Project(2010CB732004) supported by the National Basic Research Program of China Project(NCET-11-0528) supported by Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of China
关键词 dynamic Brazil test Brazilian disc stress evolution failure pattern 应力分布 巴西圆盘 破坏过程 分离式Hopkinson压杆 FASTCAM 演化 裂纹扩展 SHPB
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1HONDROS G. The evaluation of Poisson's ratio and modulus of materials of a low tensile resistance by the Brazilian test with particular reference to concrete [J]. Australian Journal of Applied Sciences, 1959, 10(3): 243-268.
  • 2FAIRHURST C. On the validity of the Brazilian test for brittle materials [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1964, 1(4): 535 546.
  • 3MELLOR M, HAWKES 1. Measurement of tensile strength by diametral compression of discs and annuli [J]. Engineering Geology, 1971, 5(3):173 225.
  • 4HUDSON J A, BROWN E T, RUMMEL F. The controlled failure of rock discs and rings loaded in diametral compression [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences & Geomechanics Abstracts, 1972, 9(2): 241-248.
  • 5BIENIAWSKI ZT, HAWKES I. Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials [J]. Intemational Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 1978, 15(3): 99-103.
  • 6ZHAO J, LI H B. Experimental determination of dynamic tensile properties of a granite [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Science, 2000, 37(5): 861-866.
  • 7ZHOU Zi-long, MA G W, LI Xi-bing. Dynamic Brazilian splitting and spalling tests for granite [C]//Proc llth Cong ISRM, Ribeiro e Sousa, Olalla & Grossmann, eds. London: Taylor & Francis Group, 2007, 1127-1130.
  • 8DAI Feng, HUANG Sheng, XIA K. Some fundamental issues in dynamic compression and tension tests of rocks using Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar [J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2010, 43(6): 657-666.
  • 9ZHU W C, TANG C A. Numerical simulation of Brazilian disk rock failure under static and dynamic loading [J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2006, 43(2): 236-252.
  • 10喻勇.质疑岩石巴西圆盘拉伸强度试验[J].岩石力学与工程学报,2005,24(7):1150-1157. 被引量:59

二级参考文献11

  • 1ISRM.Suggested methods for determining tensile strength of rock materials[J].Int.J.Rock Mech.Min.Sci.and Geomech.Abstr.,1978,15(1):99-103.
  • 2中华人民共和国行业标准编写组.水利水电工程岩石试验规程(DLJ204-81,SLJ2-81)[S].[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,1982..
  • 3中华人民共和国国家标准编写组.工程岩体试验方法标准(GB/ T50266-99)[S].北京:中国计划出版社,1999..
  • 4Hondros G.The evaluation of Poisson's ratio and the modulus of materials of a low tensile resistance by the Brazilian (indirect tensile)[J].Test with Particular Reference to Concrete.Aust.J.Apple.Sci.,1959,10(3):243-268.
  • 5Mellor M,Hawkes I.Measurement of tensile strength by diameter compression[J].Engineering Geology,1971,5(2):173-225.
  • 6ASTM.Standard Test Method for Splitting Tensile Strength of Cylindrical Concrete Specimens(ASTM C496-86)[S].[s.l.]:[s.n.],1986.
  • 7中华人民共和国行业标准编写组.水利水电工程岩石试验规程(SL264-2001)[S].北京:中国水利水电出版社,2001..
  • 8铁摩辛柯 古地尔著 徐芝论译.弹性理论[M].北京:高等教育出版,1990..
  • 9张少华,缪协兴,赵海云.试验方法对岩石抗拉强度测定的影响[J].中国矿业大学学报,1999,28(3):243-246. 被引量:42
  • 10叶明亮,续建科,牟宏,洪海春.岩石抗拉强度试验方法的探讨[J].贵州工业大学学报(自然科学版),2001,30(6):19-25. 被引量:30

共引文献58

同被引文献111

引证文献7

二级引证文献68

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部