期刊文献+

基于粗集的多准则决策分析 被引量:14

Multi-criteria decision analysis based on rough sets
原文传递
导出
摘要 多准则决策分析(MCDA)用于解决分类、分级、选择、排序和描述问题,随着现实世界正变得由数据所驱动,传统的MCDA方法面临着更多的挑战.粗集方法是MCDA的有用工具,在多准则决策问题的分类框架下,从二元关系的角度对粗集方法的研究现状进行了评述,包括二元关系的建立、定义粗糙近似、导出决策规则和规则应用,并通过文献研究得出了基于粗集的MCDA方法的发展动态. The objective of multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) is to solve one of the following typologies of problems: Classification, sorting, choice, ranking and description. As the world is becoming data-driven, the challenges of traditional MCDA methodologies are rapidly increasing. The rough set approach is a useful tool for MCDA. The objective is to review the rough-set-based research conducted on the framework of the MCDA from the perspective of binary relations, including the construction of binary relations, the definition of rough approximations, the inference of decision rules and the application of the rules. The development trends of MCDA methods based on rough sets are commented through the literature research.
出处 《控制与决策》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2013年第1期1-12,19,共13页 Control and Decision
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(71071079)
关键词 多准则决策分析 粗集 二元关系 决策规则 multi-criteria decision analysis rough sets binary relations decision rules
  • 相关文献

参考文献98

  • 1Roy B. Multicriteria methodology for decision aiding[M]. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishing, 1996: 19-30.
  • 2Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review[J]. European J of Operational Research, 2002, 138 (2): 229-246.
  • 3Wallenius J, Dyer J S, Fishburn P C, et al. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: Recent accomplishments and what lies ahead[J]. Management Science, 2008, 54(7): 1336-1349.
  • 4Keeney R L, Raiffa H. Decisions with multiple objectives: Preferences and value tradeoffs[M]. New York: Wiley, 1976: 131-218.
  • 5Saaty T L. The analytic hierarchy process[M]. New York: McGraw Hill, 1980: 1-287.
  • 6Roy B. How outranking relation helps multiple criteria decision making[C]. Multiple Criteria Decision Making. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1973: 179- 201.
  • 7Brans J P, Mareschal B, Vincke E PROMETHEE: A new family of outranking methods in multicriteria analysis[C]. Operational Research' 84. North-Holland: Elsevier Science Publishers, 1984: 477-490.
  • 8Jacquet-Lagr6ze E. An application of the UTA discriminant model for the evaluation of R&D projects[C]. Advances in Multicriteria Analysis. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995: 203-211.
  • 9Mousseau V, Slowinski R. Inferring an ELECTRE TRI model from assignment examples[J]. J of Global Optimization, 1998, 12(2): 157-174.
  • 10Zopounidis C, Doumpos M. A multicriteria decision aid methodology for sorting decision problems: The case of financial distress[J]. Computational Economics, 1999, 14(3): 197-218.

二级参考文献180

共引文献653

同被引文献107

引证文献14

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部