期刊文献+

盐酸罗哌卡因在硬膜外无痛分娩中的临床观察 被引量:14

Clinical observation of ropivacaine hydrochloride in epidural narcotic analgesia delivery
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的了解盐酸罗哌卡因在硬膜外无痛分娩中的应用效果及临床意义。方法随机抽取2010年8月~2011年9月282例经阴道分娩的初产妇,其中无痛分娩组141例,对照组141例,比较两组分娩镇痛、顺产率、剖宫产率、产后出血率、产钳助产率、胎儿窘迫发生率及新生儿Apgar评分的变化。结果在镇痛后10 min及第二产程,无痛分娩组VAS评分均明显低于对照组和无痛分娩组镇痛前VAS评分,差异均显著(P均<0.05)。无痛分娩组顺产率明显提高,剖宫产率显著下降,与对照组比较有显著性差异(P<0.05);阴道助产、胎儿窘迫、产后出血、缩宫素使用及新生儿评分两组比较,差异不显著(P>0.05)。结论无痛分娩能减轻疼痛,盐酸罗哌卡因在硬膜外分娩镇痛对母婴安全可靠,值得临床推广应用。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of ropivacaine hydrochloride in epidural narcotic analgesia de- livery. Methods All of 282 primiparas through vaginal deliveries from August 2010 to September 2011 were randomly choosen. 141 primiparas were used epidural narcotic analgesia delivery (painless labor group),and 141 primiparas were not use any analgesia method(control group). The changes of labor analgesia, natural labour rate, cesarean section rate, postnatal hemorrhage rate, forceps birth rate,fetal distress rate and Apgar score between the two groups were com- pared. Results VAS siores of painless labor group in analgesia after 10 rain and second stage of labor were lower than those of control group(P 〈 0.05). There were significant differences in natural labour rate and cesarean section rate be- tween the two groups (P 〈 0.05). There was no significant difference in forceps birth rate, fetal distress rate,postnatal hemorrhage rate, oxytocin use and Apgar score between the two groups(P 〉 0.05). Conclusion The painless labor can alleviate the pain.h is safe, reliable and worthy for clinical ride in epidural narcotic analgesia delivery. popularization and application that ropivacaine hydrochlo-
出处 《中国现代医生》 2013年第2期129-130,132,共3页 China Modern Doctor
关键词 盐酸罗哌卡因 硬膜外 镇痛 分娩 Ropivacaine hydrochloride Epidural Analgesic Delivery
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献33

  • 1宋先荣,张咸虎,师爱青,鲁应军.术中唤醒麻醉技术在脊柱侧弯矫正术中的应用[J].实用诊断与治疗杂志,2005,19(8):602-602. 被引量:7
  • 2汤蓓蕾,周晓宇,周向明,肖旺频.硬膜外镇痛分娩对足月产妇胎儿血气和新生儿结局的影响[J].浙江医学,2006,28(1):48-49. 被引量:5
  • 3Stienstra R, Jonker T, Bourdrez P et al. Ropivacaine 0. 25% versus bupivacaine 0.25% for continuous epidural analgesia in labor : a double blind comparison [J]. Anesth Analg, 1995, 80 (2) : 285.
  • 4Collis RE, Plaat FS, Morgan BM. Comparison of midwife top - ups, continuous infusion and patient - controlled epidural analgesia for maintaining morbility after a low- dose combined spinal -epidural [J]. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 82 (2): 233.
  • 5黄宇光,罗爱伦麻醉科分册[M].北京:中国协和医科大学出版,2000:322-331.
  • 6Gautie P, Dekock M, Van Steenberge A et al. A double blind compari- son of 0. 105% ropivacaine with sufentanil and 0. 125% bupivacaine with sufentanil for epidural labor analgesis [ J]. Anesthesiology, 1999, 90 : 772.
  • 7Alienzar MC, Palanca JM, Borras R et al. Ropivacaine O. 1% with fent- anyl 2 microg mL ( - 1 ) by epidural infusion for labour analgesia [J]. Eur J Anaesthesiol, 2004, 21 (10) : 7701.
  • 8Russell R, Reynolds F. Epidural infusion of low dose bupivaca ine and opioid in labor. Does reducing motor block increase the spontaneous de- livery rate [J]. Anaesthesia, 1996, 51 (3) : 2661.
  • 9Carpenter RL, Abram SE, Bromage PR et al. Consensus statementon a- cute pain management [ J ]. Reg Anaesth, 1996, 21 (Supp 1) :75280.
  • 10Merson N. A comparison of motor block between ropivacaine and bupivacaine for continuous labor epidural analgesia [J].AANA J,2001, 69(1):54-58.

共引文献403

同被引文献136

引证文献14

二级引证文献125

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部