摘要
本文通过对古希腊苏格拉底的对话与孔子的《论语》在言说方式（ｌｏｇｏｓ）上的比较，证明苏格拉底的对话把言说标准确立于言说本身，具有向对话双方自由开放的性质，孔子则把言说标准放在言说之外的个人情感体验之中，是一种任意独断的权力话语，由此而形成了中西两千多年传统思维方式和言说方式的根本区别。
In this paper, Sookratees's dialogue is compared with Confucian Analects. With the quality of opening, Sookratees's dialogue is verified to be based on logos itself, while Confucian logos standard is confirmed to be based on a kind of individual feeing and experi- ence. The difference in logos standard has resulted in the essential distinction in logos between the East and the West over more than 2000 years.
出处
《开放时代》
2000年第3期39-45,共7页
Open Times
