期刊文献+

辅助生殖技术(ART)助孕获得多胎妊娠行减胎术后妊娠结局观察 被引量:14

Observation of Pregnancy Outcomes of Multifetal Pregnancy Reduction by Assisited Reproductive Technology (ART)
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨辅助生殖技术(ART)获得的多胎妊娠孕早期行经阴道减胎术的有效性和安全性。方法:以经ART助孕获得多胎妊娠行经阴道减胎术的患者123例为减胎组,根据减胎后保留的胎儿数分为双胎组(A组,n=90)和单胎组(B组,n=33)。另以同期经ART助孕获得单胎妊娠(C组,n=36)和双胎妊娠(D组,n=57)的患者为对照组。回顾性分析患者的妊娠结局及妊娠期并发症发生情况。结果:减胎组的减胎成功率为100.0%,妊娠成功率为91.9%。A组胎膜早破发生率、早产发生率、新生儿低出生体质量发生率、新生儿重症监护室(NICU)入住率均高于B组(P<0.05)。结论:多胎妊娠孕早期行经阴道减胎术安全、有效、可行。多胎妊娠实施减胎术中减为单胎更为安全。 Objective: To explore the effectiveness and safety ofmultifetal pregnancy reduction after assisted reproduction technology (ART). Methods: A total of 123 cases received multifetal pregnancy reduction after ART were retrospectively analyzed. They were divided into twin pregnancies group (group A, n= 90) and single pregnancy group (group B, n=33) according to the number of live fetus after multiple pregnancy reduction. Another 93 pregnancy cases after ART at the same period were set as the control, and were also divided into twin pregnancies group (group C, n=36) and single pregnancy group (group D, n=57). Results: 1) All 123 cases were successful, the successful rate of reduction was 100.0%, the successful rate of pregnancy was 91.9%. 2) The rate of premature rupture of membrane, premature delivery, occurence rate of low birth weight and NICU occupancy in group A were higher than those in group B, the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion: 1) Transvaginal ultrasound-guided multifetal pregnancy reduction in the first trimester is a safe, efficient and feasible method after ART. 2) It's much safer to reduce to a singleton in multifetal pregnancy reduction.
出处 《生殖与避孕》 CAS CSCD 2013年第1期63-66,共4页 Reproduction and Contraception
关键词 减胎术 多胎妊娠 辅助生殖技术(ART) multifetal pregnancy reduction multiple gestation assisted reproduction technology (ART)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1马翔,丁卫,冒韵东,王媁,刘嘉茵.授精第3日单胚胎移植与双胚胎移植临床结局分析[J].生殖与避孕,2011,31(8):554-561. 被引量:13
  • 2McLernon D J,Harrild K,Bergh C. Clinical effectiveness of elective single versus double embryo transfer:metaanalysis of individual patient data from randomised trials[J].British Medical Journal,2010.c6945.
  • 3Drakeley AJ,Roberts D,Alrevic Z. Cervical cerclage for prevention ofpreterm delivery:Meta-analysis of randomized trials[J].Obstetrics and Gynecology,2003,(03):621-627.
  • 4乐杰.妇产科学[M]北京:人民卫生出版社,20097.
  • 5Dickey RP,Taylor SN,Lu PY. Spontaneous reduction of multiple pregnancy:incidence and effect on outcome[J].American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology,2002,(01):77-83.
  • 6La Sala GB,Nicoli A,Villani MT. Spontaneous embryonic loss rotes in twin and singleton pregnancies after transfer of top-versus intermediate-quality embryos[J].Fertility and Sterility,2005,(06):1602-1605.
  • 7Glujovsky D,Shamonki MI,Bergh PA. Embryonic synergism may reduce pregnancy loss:a multivariate regression analysis[J].Fertility and Sterility,2007,(03):509-514.doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.07.1518.
  • 8Evans MI,Kaufman MI,Urban AJ. Fetal reduction from twins to a singleton:A reasonable consideration[J].Obstetrics and Gynecology,2004,(01):102-109.
  • 9Stromberg B,Dahlquist G,Ericson A. Neurological sequelae in children born after in-vitro fertilization:a population-based study[J].Lancet,2002,(9305):461-465.
  • 10The ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy[J].Human Reproduction,2000,(08):1856-1864.doi:10.1093/humrep/15.8.1856.

二级参考文献37

  • 1徐玉萍,曹云霞,章志国,魏兆莲,周平,丛林,李芬,赵济华.卵泡发育速度对胚胎发育及体外受精-胚胎移植结局的影响[J].安徽医科大学学报,2006,41(4):462-465. 被引量:15
  • 2Schnorr JA, Doviak MJ, Muasher S J, et al. Impact of a cryopreservation program on the multiple pregnancy rate associated with assisted reproductive technologies. Fertil Steril, 2001, 75(1):147-51.
  • 3van Wely M, Twisk M, Mol BW, et al. Is twin pregnancy necessarily an adverse outcome of assisted reproductive technologies? Hum Reprod, 2006, 21(11):2 736-8.
  • 4Bergh C, Moller A, Nilsson L. Obstetric outcome and psychological follow-up of pregnancies after embryo reduction. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14(8): 2 170-5.
  • 5Devreker F, Emiliani S, Revelard P, et al. Comparison of two elective transfer policies of two embryos to reduce multiple pregnancies without impairing pregnancy rates. Hum Reprod, 1999, 14 (1): 83-9.
  • 6Boulot P, Vergnes C, Zhou CQ, et al. Multifetai reduction of triplets to twins: a prospective comparison of pregnancy outcome. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(7): 1 619-23.
  • 7ESHRE Capri Workshop Group. Multiple gestation pregnancy. Hum Reprod, 2000, 15(8): 1 856-64.
  • 8Andersen AN, Gianaroli L, Felberbaum R, et al. Assisted reproductive technology in Europe, 2001. Hum Reprod, 2005, 20(5): 1 158-76.
  • 9Soren Ziebe, Kersti L, Janssens R, et al. Influence of ovarian stimulation with HP-hMG or recombinant FSH on embryo quality parameters in patients undergoing IVF. Hum Reprod, 2007, 22(9):2 404-13.
  • 10Land JA, Evers JL. Risks and complications in assisted reproduction techniques: report of an ESHRE consensus meeting. Hum Reprod, 2003, 18(2):455-7.

共引文献29

同被引文献116

引证文献14

二级引证文献66

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部