摘要
梁启超早年与清学正统派学术结下了很深的渊源。虽然他一度信奉、鼓吹康有为的政论式今文经学说，但由于治学路向的差异，梁启超晚年逐渐逸出今文经学，表露出一种向清学正统派复归的趋向，尤其他弃政从学以后这种趋向更加明显。这一文化现象其实折射出了传统学术与现代学术之间血脉相通的联系，而２０世纪初年的中国学术也正是以回归传统学术的姿态走向了现代学术，完成了传统向现代的学术转型。
Being trained strictly in the traditional school when he was young, Liang Qi-chao had close relevance to the orthodox school of Qing dynasty. Though he had once believed in the theory of new text Confucianism of Kang You-wei, due to the difference of his research orientation, he exited from it and returned to the orthodox school in his old age. The inclination was more obvious after he went back to study from his political position. This cultural phenomenon reflects the relationship between the orthodox academic school and the modern one. At the beginning of 20th century, the Chinese academia completed its transformation to the modern academic school by returning to the orthodox academic school.
出处
《文史哲》
CSSCI
北大核心
2000年第4期34-41,共8页
Literature,History,and Philosophy
