摘要
国外理论界对直接证据与间接证据划分标准的研究已经进行得相当充分,并由此形成了许多颇具代表性和影响力的学说与观点。直接证据与间接证据划分的理论难题在于,法律事实构成要件中的某些要件具有明显的法律评价性,无法直接成为直接证据的证明对象。应通过对"主要事实"和"法律事实"加以区分的方法,剥离法律事实中的评价性要件,从而为直接证据与间接证据的区分提供一种新的思路。
The research on the partition of the direct evidence and the circumstance evidence had get much progress in foreign evidence law field,many profound and influential teories on this topic come into being.The most importance issue on the partition of the direct evidence and the circumstance evidence is： some of the constitutional elements of legal fact are evaluated by law that make these elements can not be proved by direct evidence directly.This article try to peel off the evaluated elements from constitutional elements the by means of distinguish the ＂main fact＂ and the ＂legal fact＂,which may become another method on the partition of the direct evidence and the circumstance evidence.
出处
《法学论坛》
CSSCI
北大核心
2013年第1期92-98,共7页
Legal Forum
基金
中国法学会部级课题"医疗损害责任在司法实践中的若干问题研究"(CLS[2011]D93)的部分研究成果
关键词
直接证据
间接证据
直接证明
间接证明
direct evidence
circumstance evidence
direct prove
indirect prove
