5FD Rahusen,AH Taets van Amerongen,PJ Diest,PJ Borgstein,RP Bleichrodt,S Meijer.Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy of nonpalpable breast cancers: a feasibility study looking at the accuracy of obtained margins[].Journal of Surgical Oncology.1999
6Chiou SY,Chou YH,Chiou HJ,et al.Sonographic features of nonpalpable breast cancer:A study based on ultrasound-guided wire-localized surgical biopsies[].Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology.2006
7Haffty BG,,Lee C,Philpotts L,et al.Prognostic significance of mammo-graphic detection in a cohort of conservatively treated breast cancer pa-tients[].Cancer Journal from Scientific American.1998
4Haffty BG, Lee C, Philpotts L, et al. Prognostic significance of mammographic detection in a cohort of conservatively treatted breast cancer patients. Cater J Sci Am, 1998, 4(1): 35
5Alexander FE, Anderson TJ, Brown HK, et al. 14 years of follow- up from the Edinburgh randomized trial of breast cancer screening. Lancet, 1999, 353(9168) : 1903
6Hou MF, Chuang HY, Ou-Yang F, et al. Comparison of breast mammography, sonography and physical examination for screening women at high risk of breast cancer in taiwan. Ultrasound Med Biol, 2002, 28(4):415
7Skinner KA, Silberman H, Sposto R, et al. Palpable breast cancers are inherently different from nonpalpable breast cancers. Ann Surg Oncol, 2001, 8(9):705
8Lehman CD, Blume JD, Weatherall P. Screening women at high risk for breast cancer with marnmography and magnetic resonance imaging. Cancer,2005,103(9) :1898
9Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultra sound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA, 2004,292(11): 1317
10Skiverstein Mj,Lagios MD,Craig PH,et al.A prognostic index for ductal carcinoma in situ of the breast[J] cancer,1996,77 (10):2 224 ～ 2 267.
1Kaplan SS, Racenstein MJ, Wong WS, et al. US-guided core bi- opsy of the breast with a coaxial system, Radiology, 1995, 194 (2) :573-575.
2Burbank F, Forcier N. Tissue marking clip for stereotactic breast biopsy: Initial placement accuracy, long-term stability and useful- ness as a guide for wire localization. Radiology, 1997, 205 (2): 407-415.
3Phillips SW, Gabriel H, Comstock CE, et al. Sonographically guided metallic clip placement after core needle biopsy of the breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2000,175(5) :1353-1355.
4Thomassin-Naggara I, Lalonde L, David J, et al. A plea for the biopsy marker: How, why and why not clipping after breast biop- sy? Breast Cancer Res Treat, 2012,132(3):881-893.
5Erpelding TN, Kim C, Pramanik M, et al. Sentinel lymph nodes in the rat : Noninvasive photoacoustic and US imaging with a clini- cal US system. Radiology, 2010,256(1) : 102-110.
6Vdzquez Forner C, Gimfinez Climent J, Fliquete Peris MV, et al. Locating the sentinel node in breast cancer by gamma probe and staining agent. Preliminary study. Rev Esp Med Nucl, 2000, 19 (3) :207-210.
7Uematsu T. Commercially available Titanium clip placement fol- lowing a sonographically guided core needle biopsy of the breast. Breast J, 2007,13(6) :624-626.
8Yang WT, Goldberg BB. Microbubble contrast-enhanced ultra- sound for sentinel lymph node detection: Ready for prime time? AJR Am J Roentgenol, 2011,196(2):249-250.
9YuY, Liu JB, Yin LX. Application progress of lymphography in oneology. Front Med China, 2009,3(1) : 13-19.
