期刊文献+

中美股票市场风险差异的新解释——收益对市场风险不对称效应的CAViaR模型与实证 被引量:9

New Explaination in the Risk between China and US Stock Market:CAViaR Models in Asymmetric Effect of Market Risk to Return and Empirical Analysis
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 在研究收益对市场风险的影响关系中,本文发现金融市场的风险呈现不对称性。基于直接就收益对市场风险建模的CAViaR模型,提出包含信息不对称性的GJR-CAViaR模型,弥补了AS-CAViaR和TARCH-CAViaR模型中在模型参数限制上的不足。将此模型应用在上证综指和纳斯达克指数上,可定量地刻画相同的收益引起的中美股票市场风险的差异,实证结果还表明收益对市场风险的不对称性在中国股市上表现得更加明显。 This paper finds that the leverage effect exists in the relationship between return and market risk, that is, the asymmetric response of market risk to positive and negative returns. CAViaR model is constructed by considerding the return variable directly when es- timating VaR. To solve the parameter restriction implicitly in AS-CAViaR and TARCH- CAViaR, we introduce GJR-CAViaR model to quantitate the leverage effect. The applica- tion to SSEC and NASDAQ indexes provides empirical support to the risk difference in China and US stock market. Besides, the asymmetric effect is more apparent in China stock market.
作者 张颖 孙和风
出处 《南开经济研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第5期111-120,共10页 Nankai Economic Studies
关键词 市场风险 不对称效应 GJR-CAViaR Market Risk Asymmetric Effect G JR-CAViaR
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1王新宇,宋学锋.间接TARCH-CAViaR模型及其MCMC参数估计与应用[J].系统工程理论与实践,2008,28(9):46-51. 被引量:21
  • 2Bao, Y. T-H. Lee, and B. Saltoglu. Evaluating Predictive Performance of Value-at-risk Models in Emerging Markets: a Reality Check[J]. Journal of Forecasting, 2006, 25 (2) : 101-28.
  • 3Black, G.W. Selected Annual Bound Volume Production[J]. Special Libraries, 1976, 67 (11) : 534-36.
  • 4Ding, Z. C. W. J. Granger, and R. F. Engle. A Long Memory Property of Stock Market Returns and a New Model[J]. Journal of Empirical Finance, 1993, 1 (1) : 83-106.
  • 5Duda, M. and H. Schmidt. Evaluation of Various Approaches to VALUE AT RISK[D]. Master Thesis, LundUniversity, 2009.
  • 6Engle, R. F. and S. Manganelli. CAViaR: Conditional Autoregressive Value at Risk by Regres- sion Quantiles[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2004, 22 (4) : 367-81.
  • 7Engle, R.F. and V. K. Ng. Measuring and Testing the Impact of News on Volatility[J]. Journal of Finance, 1993, 48(5): 1749-78.
  • 8Manganelli, S, , and R. F, Engle. Value at Risk Models in Finance [R]. Working Paper No. 75, 2001.
  • 9Markowitz, H.M. Portfolio Selection[J]. Journal of Finance, 1952, VII(1): 77-91.
  • 10Nelson, D. B. Conditional Heteroskedasticity in Asset Returns - a New Approach[J]. Economet- rica, 199l, 59(2): 347-70.

二级参考文献11

  • 1Roger Koenker, Gilbert Bassett, Jr. Regression quantiles[ J]. Econometrica, 1978, 46( 1 ) :33 - 50.
  • 2Roger Koenker. Quantile Regression[ M]. Cambridge University Press, May, 9, 2005.
  • 3Robert F Engle, Simone Manganelli. CAViaR: Conditional autoressive value at risk by regression quantiles[J]. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 2004, 22(4) : 367 - 381.
  • 4Jean-Michel Zakoian. Threshold heteroskedastic models[J]. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 1994, 18(5) : 931 - 955.
  • 5Yu K M,Zhang J. A three-parameter asymmetric Laplace distribution and its extension[ J]. Communications in Statistics Theory and Methods, 2005, 34(9- 10): 1867- 1879.
  • 6Geman S, Geman D. Stochastic relaxation, Gibbs distributions, and the Bayesian restoration of images[J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1984, 6: 721 - 741.
  • 7Metropolis N, Ulam S. The Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 1949, 44(247):335- 341.
  • 8Yu K M, Rana A Moyeed. Bayesian quantile regression[J]. Statistics & Probability Letters, 2001, 54(4) : 437 - 447.
  • 9Arnold Zellner. An Introduction to Bayesian Inference in Econometrics[M]. New York: John Wiley Press, 1971.
  • 10Gilks W R, Wild P. Adaptive rejection sampling for Gibbs sampling[J]. Applied Statistics, 1992,41(2) :337 - 348.

共引文献20

同被引文献63

引证文献9

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部