摘要
目的:调查正畸患者对软组织侧貌面型的审美偏好,并探索不同年龄和性别的患者是否存在审美差异,为临床矫治提供参考。方法:根据面突角建立男女侧貌渐变模型,采用电子问卷形式,随机调查203例患者[平均(19.2±6.0)岁,男70例,女133例]对下颌后缩的容忍边界值、下颌前突的容忍边界值和最满意的侧貌面突度。采用SPSS17.0软件包对数据进行统计描述和秩和检验。结果:正畸患者对男女侧貌面突度的可接受范围分别为168°～180°、160°～172°,最满意的侧貌面突度分别为172°、168°。不同性别组患者的审美差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。不同年龄组患者的审美差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),成年组患者对下颌后缩的容忍边界值、男性下颌前突的容忍边界值和男性最满意侧貌突度较未成年组患者大。结论:患者对侧貌面型均存在可接受范围和最满意侧貌,但对侧貌面型的审美偏好有差异;患者对侧貌面型的审美观受年龄影响,不受性别影响。
PURPOSE： To investigate facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients and determine whether the patient＇s age and sex were influential factors in the esthetic perception for providing reference for clinical practice. METHODS： Profile digital photographs of each patient were used. Changes in facial convexity were established by altering the position of mandible incrementally with Photoshop 7.0. Thus profile images of various degrees of mandiblular anteroposterior discrepancy for each patient was generated. Then an electronic questionnaire was designed and administered to investigate tolerable boundary values for mandibular retrognathism, tolerable boundary values for mandibular prognathism and most pleasing profiles of 203 subjects （average age 19.2＋6.0 years; 70 males, 133 females）. Differences between male and female profiles in the esthetic perception of patients were analyzed by Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed ranks test. Comparison of esthetics perception for male and female profiles regarding patient＇s sex and age was made by Wilcoxon rank sum test of two independent samples. All statistical analysis was performed using SPSS 17.0 software package. RESULTS： The zone of acceptability of facial convexity was 168^-180~ for male model and 160^-172~ for female model. The most pleasing profile was 172~ for male and 168~ for female. There was no significant difference between male and female patients in facial profile preferences （/9〉0.05）. The differences in facial profile preferences between adult group and immature group were statistically significant （/~〈0.05）. In the comparison of age groups, the adult group preferred bigger facial convexity angles than immature group for male and female retrognathia profile, male prognathia profile and male most pleasing profile. CONCLUSIONS： The zone of acceptability of facial convexity and the most pleasing profile exist in patients＇ esthetic perception of profile. There is difference between male and female profiles in the esthetic perception. The facial profile preferences of orthodontic patients are influenced by age, not by sex. Supported by Science and Technology Project of Guangdong Province（2010B080701068）.
出处
《上海口腔医学》
CAS
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第6期668-672,共5页
Shanghai Journal of Stomatology
基金
广东省科技计划项目(2010B080701068)~~
关键词
侧貌
面突角
可接受范围
审美偏好
Profile
Facial convexity： Zone of acceptability
Esthetic preference
