期刊文献+

基金资助论文与无基金资助论文被引情况分析:以部分高水平医学期刊为例 被引量:17

Analysis of differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers in some high-level medical journals
暂未订购
导出
摘要 选择基金资助论文作为高水平论文,对其被引用情况进行分析,同时与无基金资助论文的被引情况进行比较,以探讨二者被引情况存在的差异。结果表明,被引用过的基金资助论文的单篇被引频次并不比无基金资助论文高,而基金资助论文的被引率显著高于无基金资助论文。由此可见,论文的引用率可推广应用于表示期刊的水平。 This article chose funded papers as high-level papers, analyzed the citations of these papers, and investigated the differences in citation between funded papers and non-funded papers. The results suggested that there was no difference in citation frequency of single paper between funded papers and non-funded papers, while there was significant difference in citation rate between funded papers and non-funded papers. It could be got that citation rate of papers may be used to reflect the levels of journals.
出处 《南京医科大学学报(社会科学版)》 2012年第6期499-501,共3页 Journal of Nanjing Medical University(Social Sciences)
基金 江苏省科技期刊研究基金项目(JKQJXB023 JKQJXB001)
关键词 基金资助 被引频次 被引率 fund citation frequency citation rate
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

二级参考文献39

共引文献243

同被引文献183

引证文献17

二级引证文献67

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部