期刊文献+

手法小切口无缝线白内障摘除术与超声乳化吸除术临床随机对照研究的Meta分析 被引量:9

Meta-analysis of clinically randomized controlled trials on manual small incision suturelesscataract surgery and phaco
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的系统评价手法小切口无缝线白内障摘除(MSICS)与白内障超声乳化吸除术(Phaco)治疗年龄相关性白内障的疗效及安全性。方法循证医学研究。计算机检索Cochrane Library、Embase、PubMed、中国期刊全文数据库(CNKI)、中国生物医学文献数据库(CBM)、维普中文期刊数据库(VIP)。全面收集MSICS治疗年龄相关性白内障的临床随机对照试验,评价纳入研究的质量,提取有效数据,采用RevMan5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果共纳入13个临床随机对照试验,共2870眼,MSICS组1469眼,Phaco组1401眼。Meta分析显示:术后6周矫正视力≥0.3的比例两组比较差异无统计学意义怪0.61,P〉0.05),术后近期散光两组比较差异无统计学意义(Z=0.34,P〉0.05),但远期两组比较差异有统计学意义(Z=10.16,P〈0.01)。手术前后角膜内皮细胞丢失(Z=0.78,P〉0.05)及术后并发症(Z=0.74,P〉0.051比较两组差异均无统计学意义。从手术成本及手术时间看,Phaco比MSICS所需费用高且耗时长。结论MSICS治疗年龄相关性白内障与Phaco比较具有相似的疗效及安全性,但前者在手术成本、耗费时间方面有优势,有利于在没有开展超声乳化术的区域及大量基层白内障复明手术中开展。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy and safety in the treatment of age-related cataract by comparing manual small incision sutureless cataract surgery (MSICS) with phacoemulsification (Phaco). Methods In a systematic review and meta-analysis, trials were identified by searching databases for randomized clinically controlled trials on the treatment of age-related cataract by manual small incision sutureless cataract surgery and phacoemulsification. The following databases were searched up to February 2012: Cochrane Library, Embase, PubMed, CBM, CNKI and VIP. The quality of the included trials was assessed and meta-analyses were performed with RevMan 5.1 software. Results A total of 13 randomized clinically controlled trials involving 2870 eyes were included. There were no statistically significant differences in the ratio of postoperative visual acuity ≥0.3 (Z=0.61, P〉0.05), endothelial cell loss (Z=0.78, P〉0.05), or postoperative complications (Z=0.74, P〉0.05). But there were statistically significant differences in postoperative astigmatism between the two groups 6 weeks after surgery (Z=10.16, P〈0.01). MSICS was far more economical and time saving than phacoemulsification. Conclusion Meta-analysis shows that MSICS has equal efficacy and safety compared to Phaco in the treatment of age-related cataract. Because MSICS is far more economical and time saving, it should be recommended for use in basic hospitals in China.
出处 《中华眼视光学与视觉科学杂志》 CAS 2012年第12期757-760,共4页 Chinese Journal Of Optometry Ophthalmology And Visual Science
关键词 小切口白内障摘除 超声乳白内障化吸除术 随机对照试验 META分析 Small-incision cataract surgery Phacoemulsification Randomized controlled trial Meta-analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Gogate PM, Kulkarni SR, Krishnaiah S, et al. Safety and efficacy of phacoemulsification compared with manual small- incision cataract surgery by a randomized controlled clinical trial: six-week results. Ophthalmology,2005,112:869-874.
  • 2Jadad A, Moore R, Carroll D, et al. Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials, 1996,17 : 1-12.
  • 3Gogate P, Deshpande M, Nirmalan PK. Why do phacoemulsification? Manual small-incision cataract surgery is almost as effective, but less expensive. Ophthalmology,2007,114:965-968.
  • 4冀哲.白内障小切口囊外摘出术与超声乳化吸出术的疗效比较[J].中国医师进修杂志,2011,34(15):26-28. 被引量:8
  • 5林映竑,庄鹏,韩雅玲,胡小坤,郑彩慧.白内障小切口手法摘除术与超声乳化吸出术临床疗效比较观察[J].临床眼科杂志,2010,18(3):225-227. 被引量:6
  • 6张磊,柳林.手法小切口无缝线白内障摘出术[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2006,28(5):346-348. 被引量:27
  • 7Gogate P, Ambardekar P, Kulkarni S, et al. Comparison of endothelial cell loss after cataract surgery: phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery: six-week results of a randomized control trial. J Cataract Refract Surg,2010,36: 247-253.
  • 8George R, Rupauliha P, Sripriya AV, et al. Comparison of endothelial cell loss and surgically induced astigmatism following conventional extracapsular cataract surgery, manual small-incision surgery and phacoemulsification. Ophthalmic Epidemiol,2005, 12 : 293-297.
  • 9Venkatesh R, Tan CS, Sengupta S, et al. Phacoemulsification versus manual small-incision cataract surgery for white cataract. J Cataract Refract Surg , 2010 , 36:1849-1854.
  • 10Ghosh S, Roy I, Biswas PN, et al. Prospective randomized comparative study of macalar thickness following phacoemulsification and manual small incision cataract surgery. Acta Ophthalmo1,2010,88 : 102-106.

二级参考文献36

共引文献208

同被引文献55

  • 1鲍宏伟,郝春凤.小切口非超声乳化白内障手术70例临床分析[J].中国实用眼科杂志,2006,24(6):613-614. 被引量:21
  • 2林丁,唐罗生.手法小切口白内障手术技术[M],.长沙:湖南科学技术出版社,2011:141-142.
  • 3Fabian E, Maier M. Technologies, techniques and tactics for microincision cataract surgery. Ophthalmologe 2010 ; 107 : 116-126.
  • 4Assia EL, Apple D J, Barden A, et al. An experimental study comparing various anterior capsulectomy technique. Arch Ophthalmol 1991;109:642-647.
  • 5Fabian E, Maier M. Technologies, techniques and tactics for microincision cataract surgery [ J ]. Ophthalmologe, 2010,107 : 116 - 126.
  • 6Krag S, Thim K, Corydon L. Diathermic capsulotomy ver- sus capsulorhexis : a biochemical study [ J ]. J Cataract Re- fract Surg, 1997,23 : 86 - 90.
  • 7Nahra D, Caslilla M. Fluorescein-stained capsulorhexis [ J]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1998,24 : 1169 - 1170.
  • 8Gotzaridis EV, Ayliffe WH. Fluorescein dye improves vi- sualization during capsulorhexis in mature cataract [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg, 1999,25:1423.
  • 9Horiguchi M, Miyake K, Ohta I, et al. Staining of the lens capsule for circular continuous capsulorhexis in eyes with white cataract [ J ]. Arch Ophthalmol, 1998,116 : 535 - 537.
  • 10Chang YS, Tseng SY,Tseng SH, et al. Comparison of dyes for cataract surgery. Part 1 ~ cytotoxicity to corneal endo- thelial cells in a rabbit model [ J ]. J Cataract Refract Surg,2005,31:792 - 798.

引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部