期刊文献+

不同启动子表达Cry1Ie蛋白的特性分析 被引量:5

Analysis of Expressed Cry1Ie Protein Initiated by Different Promoters
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 苏云金芽胞杆菌启动子P1Ac与T7启动子表达的Cry1Ie蛋白对鳞翅目害虫小菜蛾(Plutella xylostella)幼虫的杀虫活性有较大差异。P1Ac启动子表达的Cry1Ie蛋白LC50为1.73μg/mL,T7启动子表达的Cry1Ie蛋白LC50为18.18μg/mL,后者是前者的10.5倍。主要从形态、碱溶性及抗胰蛋白酶稳定性等方面对其进行了初步的探索。结果显示,两者在形态上无显著差异,均有相对较为规则的颗粒存在;在碱溶性方面无显著差异,均有约20.0%的包涵体能溶解于pH10.5 50.0 mmol/L Na2CO3的溶液;在对抗胰蛋白酶的稳定性方面无明显差异,由此说明这三方面都不是二者活性差异的原因,推测是T7启动子表达的Cry1Ie蛋白折叠不正确导致其活性较差。 Insecticidal activity against Plutella xylostellabetween two proteins expressed under the promoter of cry1Ac gene(P1Ac)from Bacillus thuringiensis(Bt)and T7 fromE.colirespectively was very different.LC50of Cry1Ie polypeptides expressed by P1Ac was 1.73 μg/mL,and that expressed by T7 Promoter was 18.18 μg/mL.The latter is 10.5 folds of the former.In this study,the analyzes of Cry1Ie polypeptides on shape,solubility in alkaline,resistance to trypsin were performed respectively.The results showed no significant difference in both shape and solubility,the regular particles of expressed polypeptides could be observed under electric microscope,and approximate 20% inclusion body of two expressed polypeptides could be resolved in 50.0 mmol/L Na2CO3solution with pH10.5.Western blot result demonstrated that both expressed Cry1Ie showed very poor stability against trypsin.All the results indicated that the reason of toxicity difference between two expressed Cry1Ie was not resulted from shape,solubility and stability,but incorrect folding of Cry1Ie polypeptides expressed under strong promoter T7.
出处 《生物技术通报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第11期192-196,共5页 Biotechnology Bulletin
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(31171911) 国家"973"计划项目(2009CB118902) 国家"863"计划项目(2011AA10A203)
关键词 cry1Ac基因启动子P1Ac T7启动子 大肠杆菌 Cry1Ie蛋白 表达 Promoter of cry1Ac gene P1Ac T7 promoter E.coli Cry1Ie protein Expression
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献29

  • 1胡宏源,夏立秋,史红娟,孙运军,高必达,丁学知.苏云金芽孢杆菌伴孢晶体20kb DNA中cry1Ac基因的克隆、高效表达和生物活性研究[J].生物工程学报,2004,20(5):656-661. 被引量:6
  • 2李海涛,姚江,郭巍,宋福平,高继国,黄大昉,张杰.苏云金芽孢杆菌cry2Aa基因的克隆、表达与活性[J].农业生物技术学报,2005,13(6):787-791. 被引量:27
  • 3Crickmore N. Bacillus thuringiensis Toxin Nomenclature. [ 2008-08- 20 ]. http ://www. lifesci. sussex.ac. uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt.
  • 4Yamamoto T, Mclaughlin RE. Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, 1981,103 (2) :414 - 21.
  • 5Donovan WP, Dankocsik CC, Gilbert MP, et al. The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 1988,263 ( 1 ) :561 - 567.
  • 6Widner WR, Whiteley HR. The Journal of Bacterial, 1989,171 ( 2 ) : 965 - 947.
  • 7Wu D, Cao XL, Bai YY, Aronson AI. FEMS Microbiology Letters, 1991.81(1) :31 -36.
  • 8Choi, et at. Full list of deha-endotoxins, http://www. lifesci. sussex. ac. uk/home/Neil_Crickmore/Bt/.
  • 9Baum JA,Chu CR,Donovan WP,et al. USA,7078509[ P] ,2006-06-18.
  • 10Cheryl EB, Leon C, Roslyn GM, et al. Current Microbiology,2008,57 (3) :175 -180.

共引文献14

同被引文献31

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部