摘要
作为民国时期新自由主义的代表人物,张君劢与张东荪对民主思想有不同的系统认知,张君劢主张民主是有章可寻的制度,故重视宪法对权力的匡正;张东荪认为民主是一种文明,因而强调培养民主的生活方式。治学兴趣取向和民主思想渊源的不同,导致了他们对民主认知的差异。张君劢对政治学感兴趣,其民主思想倾向于英国经验主义传统;而张东荪以哲学为治学起点,受卢梭以及西方大陆理性派的影响较大。由此引出二人的不同民主理念,加之对时局看法的分歧,最终导致张君劢和张东荪在抗战胜利后的政治选择中分道扬镳。
In the community of thinkers of politics,ideology and culture during the historical period of the Republic of China(1911-1949),Zhang Junmai and Zhang Dongsun were very popular as representatives of neo-liberalism with their enthusiastically propagated democratic socialism and the middle-of-the-road policy.Both of them showed a tendency to rational thinking,and yet they differed themselves in their understanding of democracy and in their unique ways to change a society.The differences between them may be traced back to the different notions of democracy and personal interest in learning.The bifurcation in their viewpoints very unfortunately led to their political divergence after the victory of Anti-Japanese War.
出处
《南京大学学报（哲学．人文科学．社会科学）》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第6期88-98,156,共11页
Journal of Nanjing University(Philosophy,Humanities and Social Sciences)
基金
南京大学人文基金项目"中国近代民主社会主义思潮研究"(LSRWG1022)
