期刊文献+

飞秒激光制瓣准分子手术临床观察 被引量:1

Clinical Observation on Femtosecond Laser Flap Excimer Operation System
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的:探讨飞秒激光制瓣应用与准分子激光手术的临床效果。方法:选取准分子激光治疗中高度近视患者400例,随机分为两组,使其有可比性。其中对照组患者使用板层刀制作角膜瓣;观察组患者使用飞秒激光制作角膜瓣。对两组患者术后裸眼视力以及角膜瓣实测厚度进行比较。结果:术后1d、7d、1月、3月观察组患者裸眼视力较术前提高者分别占总数的41.50%、64.75%、68.25%和73.25%,均明显高于对照组;观察组患者术后实测角膜瓣厚度与设置值相比平均偏离15.46um,角膜瓣平均厚度与角膜顶点处角膜瓣厚度相差0.06um,而对照组上述两值分别为36.68um和16.54um。两组比较差异明显,有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:飞秒激光制作角膜瓣应用于准分子激光手术与传统板层刀相比具有更好的稳定性和安全性,是一种值得在临床中进行推广的手术技术。 Objective: To observe the clinical effects of application of femtosecond laser for valve and excimer laser operation.Method: 400 cases with high myopia treated with excimer laser operation were divided into 2 comparable groups,the control group and the observation group.The control group applied lamellar knife to make corneal flap,and the observation group used femtosecond laser to make corneal flap.Comparing the uncorrected visual acuity and corneal flap thickness measurement of the patients in 2 groups after operation.Result: A preoperative increase respectively of the patients in the observation group 1 day,7 days,1 month and 3 months after operation accounted for 41.50%,64.75%,68.25% and 73.25%,which was higher evidently than the control group.Measurement of corneal flap thickness and the set value of observation groups deviated 14.56um averagely,and the difference between corneal flap thickness and the average corneal vertex corneal flap thickness was 0.06um,but as for the control group,the 2 values above was 36.68um and 16.54um.The difference between the two groups was evident,which had statistical difference(P0.05).Conclusion: Femtosecond laser making corneal flap applied in excimer laser operation has better stability and safety compared with traditional lamellar knife,and is a kind of operation technique which is worthy to be promoted.
出处 《河北医学》 CAS 2013年第1期77-79,共3页 Hebei Medicine
基金 西安市卫生局2011年科技攻关课题 基金编号:J2011008
关键词 飞秒 板层刀 准分子 角膜瓣 Femtosecond Lamellar knife Excimer Corneal flap
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1Li Y, Netlo MV, Shekhar R, et al. A longitudinal study ofLASIK flap and stromal thickness with high: speed opdcalcoherence Tomography [ J]. Ophthalmology,2007, ( 114):1124-1132.
  • 2李秀山,张玉培,张小露,李芙蓉,邢淑慧,辛春燕.准分子激光治疗近视1249例临床疗效观察[J].眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2006,28(6):456-457. 被引量:4
  • 3查敦传,许刚,张解忠,王宁.准分子激光手术矫正近视疗效观察[J].临床眼科杂志,2007,15(5):450-452. 被引量:7
  • 4李镋海,肖瑛.近视手术治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.77-86.
  • 5Andreia Martins Rosa,Joapuim Neto Murta Maria JoaoQuadrado. Keratomileusis and effect of postoperative meas-urement interval on estimated femtosecond flap thicknessf J]. Cataract Refract Surg,2009,35:833-838.

二级参考文献11

  • 1严宗辉,朱圣练,古洵清,丁克西,胡建荣.微型角膜刀板层角膜成形联合准分子激光角膜切削术治疗高度近视[J].中国实用眼科杂志,1997,15(2):77-79. 被引量:11
  • 2李绍珍.眼科手术学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1980.170-171.
  • 3李凤鸣.眼科全书[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1996.2575.
  • 4Scerrati E.Laser in situ keratomileusis vs laser epithelial keratomileusis[J].J Cataract Refract Surg,2001,17(2):219-221.
  • 5李镜海,肖瑛.近视手术治疗学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2002,66-69.
  • 6Dinh R.Rapuano C J,Cohen EJ,et al.Recurrence of corneal dystrophy after excimer laser phototherapeutic ketatectomy[J].Ophthalmology,1999,106 (7):1490-1497.
  • 7Pallikaris IG,Paoatanki MK, Stathi ZE, et al. Laser in situ keratomileusis. Laser Surg Mek, 1990,10:463.
  • 8Massimo C. LASEK may offer the advantages of both LASEK and PRK. Ocular surgery news international, 1999, 12:112.
  • 9Helmy SA, Salah A, Badawy TT, et al. Photorefractive keratectomy and laser in situ keratomileusis for myopia between 6.00 and 10. 00 diopters. J Refract Surg,1996, 12:417-421.
  • 10蔡可丽,李镜海.准分子激光角膜切削术后2年结果分析[J].中国实用眼科杂志,1998,16(1):27-29. 被引量:6

共引文献8

同被引文献25

  • 1蒋炎云,胡燕华,张青松,雷晓华.使用飞秒激光刀制作角膜瓣行LASIK的像差分析[J].眼科研究,2007,25(3):215-217. 被引量:8
  • 2李海燕,孙同,谭勇.两种方法进行薄瓣LASIK手术矫正高度近视的临床观察[J].眼科,2007,16(3):201-205. 被引量:3
  • 3Kezirian GM, Stonecipher KG.Comparison of the IntraLase femto- second laser and mechanical keratomes for laser in situ ker- atomileusis[J].Cataract Refract Surg,2004,30(4):804-811.
  • 4Tanna M, Schallhorn SC, Hettinger KA.Femtosecond Laser ver- sus mechanical microkeratome: a retrospective comparison of vi- sual outcomes at 3 months [J].Refract Surg, 2009, 25 (7): 668-671.
  • 5Patel SV,Maguire LJ,McLaren JW,et al.Femtosecond Laser ver- sus Mechanical Microkeratome for LASIK [J].Ophthalmology, 2007,114(8):1482-1490.
  • 6Calvo R, McLaren JW, William MB, et al.Corneal aberrations and visual acuity after LASIK:Femtosecond LASIK versus me- chanical microkeratome [J].Am J Ophthalmol, 2010, 149(5): 785-793.
  • 7Choi YS, Hee Jin Jung, Kyung Hun Lee.Comparison of clinical result of LASIK using between femtosecond laser and microker- atome for correction of myopia [J].Korean Ophthalmol Soc, 48(8) : 1041-1047.
  • 8Durrie DS, Kezirian GM. Femtosecond laser versus mechanical keratome flaps in wavefront-guided laser in situ keratomileusis: prospective contralateral eye study [J].Cataract Refract Surg, 2005,31(1):120-126.
  • 9Mont6s-Mic6 R,Rodrtguez-Galietero A,Ali6 JL.Femtosecond La- ser versus Mechanical Keratome LASIK for Myopia[J].Ophthal- mology, 2007,114( 1 ) : 62-68.
  • 10Chen SH,Feng YF,Stojanovic A,et al.Intralase femtosecond la- ser vs mechanical microkeratomes in LASIK for myopia:a sys- tematic review and meta-analysis [J].Refract Surg, 2012,28 ( 1 ) : 15-24.

引证文献1

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部