期刊文献+

长春瑞滨(NP)或吉西他滨(GP)联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的成本效用研究 被引量:3

Cost utility analysis of vinorelbine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin of advanced non-small cell lung cancer
暂未订购
导出
摘要 目的评价长春瑞滨(NP)或吉西他滨(GP)联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和成本效用。方法 60例晚期NSCLC患者,每组30例,化疗4周期后,评价疗效和成本效用。结果 NP组和GP组治疗的有效率分别为36.6%和40.0%,中位生存期分别为8.52和8.37月,统计学检验发现两者之间的差异无统计学意义,P>0.05。NP组和GP组治疗的一年生存率分别为36.6%和33.3%;2年生存率分别为16.6%和13.3%,成本效用比分别为1 123.41和1 556.61。结论 NP和GP方案治疗NSCLC疗效基本相似,但NP方案治疗的成本效用相对较好。 Objective To compare and evaluate the effectiveness and cost utility of vinorelbine versus gemcitabine combined with cisplatin of advanced non-small cell lung cancer. Methods 60 advanced patients wit NSCLC were enrolled into two groups , the effectiveness and cost utility were evaluated after 2 cycles. Results The efficacy rate wit NP and GP were 36.6 % and 40.0 % respectively, An existence period wit NP and GP were 8.52 and 8.37 respectively, showing no significant difference (P 〉 0. 05) between the two groups. One year survival rate with NP and GP were 36.6 % and 40.0 % respectively; two year survival rate with NP and GP were 16.6 % and 13.3% respectively. The ratio of cost utility with NP and GP were 1123.41and 1556.61 respectively. Conclusion The effectiveness of NP versus GP of advanced non-small cell lung cancer was similar, the cost utility of NP was more than GP.
出处 《药学实践杂志》 CAS 2012年第6期462-463,480,共3页 Journal of Pharmaceutical Practice
基金 浦东新区卫生系统医学领先人才培养项目(PWRd2007-12)资助
关键词 长春瑞滨 吉西他滨 顺铂 晚期非小细胞肺癌 化疗 成本效用分析 vinorelbine gemcitabine eisplatin advanced non-small cell lung cancer chemotherapy cost utility analysis
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献19

  • 1冷嘉兴,徐建忠,孙毅,徐珍,孔颖泽.吉西他滨联合顺铂治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(3):393-394. 被引量:6
  • 2宋扬,冯英明,张贺龙,姬统理,闵婕,王宏.顺铂分别联合诺维本、健择、泰索帝治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌的临床研究[J].现代肿瘤医学,2005,13(4):494-496. 被引量:20
  • 3杨军,蔡映云,吴家琪,范肇宏,杨智,杨樱.肺癌病人生命质量评估[J].中国行为医学科学,1996,5(1):20-22. 被引量:16
  • 4徐波,赵敬生,赵晓艾,李恩孝.GP方案治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌疗效观察[J].现代肿瘤医学,2006,14(1):44-45. 被引量:4
  • 5陆舜 廖美琳 等.中国人肺癌生存质量表可行性的初步探讨(附335例肺癌患者测定结果).中国癌症研究进展(5)[M].北京:军事医学科学出版社,2000.507-511.
  • 6Ricci S, Antonuzzo A, Galli L, et al. Gemcitabine mono-therapy in elderly patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a multicenter phase II study. Lung Cancer 2000;27:75 -80.
  • 7Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, et al. Vinorelbine is well tolerated and active in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced non - small cell lung cancer: a two-stage phase II study. Eur J Cancer, 1997, 33:392 -397.
  • 8Veronesi A, Crivellari D, Magri MD, et al. Vinorelbine treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer with special emphasis on elderly patients. Eur J Cancer, 1996, 32 : 1809 - 1811.
  • 9The elderly lung cancer vinorelbine Italian study group : effects of vinorelbine on quality of life and survival of elderly patients with ad- vanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst,1999, 91:66 -72.
  • 10Gridelli C, Perrone F, Gallo C, et al. Chemotherapy for elderly patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: the Multicenter Italian Lung Cancer in the Elderly Study(MILES) phase III randomized rial. J Natl Cancer Inst,2003 ,95 :362 -372.

共引文献578

同被引文献41

引证文献3

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部