期刊文献+

基于非负矩阵分解的高光谱图像混合像元分解 被引量:3

Hyperspectral Unmixing Based on Nonnegative Matrix Factorization
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 非负矩阵分解通过将一个非负矩阵分解为两个正矩阵的乘积,已经广泛的应用于高光谱图像解混。但是非负矩阵分解直接应用于高光谱图像混合像元分解时收敛速度比较慢,容易陷入局部最优解。本文首先介绍了非负矩阵分解的基本原理,然后利用自动形态学端元提取方法获取端元光谱对非负矩阵分解中端元矩阵进行初始化。在保证非负矩阵分解中非负性和分解精度基础上,利用高光谱图像中端元光谱的非负性及其空间分布的连续性、稀疏性来对非负矩阵分解进行约束限制,其中稀疏性度量是通过非平滑的NMF算法和稀疏约束的NMF算法来实现的。最后采用多步内循环迭代的方法更新端元矩阵和丰度矩阵完成高光谱图像解混,对实际的高光谱图像进行解混取得了较好分类效果。 Non-negative Matrix Factorization (NMF) consists in factorizing a nonnegative data matrix by the product of two-rank nonnegative matrixes. It has been successfully applied as data analysis technique in hyperspectral unmixing. However, the direct application of the standard NMF algorithm to the decomposition of mixed pixels will result to the problem of local minimum and slow convergence. The basic theory of NMF algorithm is introduced firstly. Then, the endmember matrix was initialized by the automatic morphological endmember extraction method, so the endmembers selected would be close to the real endmembers. The NMF algorithm is extended by incorporating the nonnegativity and sparseness constraining to unmix hyperspectral data and make sure the error is as small as possible. The measurement of sparseness is implemented by non-smooth NMF and NMF with sparseness constraints algorithms respectively. The optimization results is got by continuous iterative. The repeated iterative calculation is included in one iterative more than once. The experimental result proves the efficiency of the approach.
出处 《光电工程》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第12期97-102,共6页 Opto-Electronic Engineering
关键词 高光谱解混 非负矩阵分解 自动形态学 端元提取 hyperspectral unmixing nonnegative matrix factorization automatic morphology endmember extraction
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Patrik O Hoyer. Nonnegative Sparse Coding [C]// Proc. IEEE Workshop on Neural Networks for Signal Processing, Martigny, Switzerland, Sept4-6, 2002: 557-565.
  • 2Pauca V P, Piper J, Plemmons R J, et al. Nonnegative matrix factorization for spectral data analysis [J]. Linear Algebra and Its Applieations, 2006, 416(1): 29-47.
  • 3TAO Feng, Li S Z, Shum Heung-Yeung, et al. Local Nonnegative Matrix Factorization as a Visual Representation [J]. The 2nd IEEE International Conference on Development and Learning, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA, June 12-15, 2002: 178-183.
  • 4Patrik O Hoyer. Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constrains [J]. Journal of Machine Learning Research(S1532-4435), 2004, 5: 1457-1469.
  • 5Lee D D, Seung H S. Learning the parts of objects by nonnegative matrix factorization [J]. Nature(S0079-8835), 1999, 401: 788-791.
  • 6Paatero E Least squares formulation Of robust non-negative factor analysis [J]. Chemometries and Intelligent Laboratory Systeins(S0169-7439), 1997, 37(1)" 23-35.
  • 7Lee D D, Seung H S. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization [J]. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems(S104%5258), 2000, 13: 556-562.
  • 8Kieko Kochi, Dietrich Lehmann, Roberto D Pascual-Marqui, et al. Non-smooth Nonnegative Matrix Factorization (nsNMF) [J]. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence(S0162-8828), 2006, 28(3): 403-415.
  • 9Antonio Plaza, Pablo Martinez, Rosa P6rez, et al. Spatial/Spectral Endmember Extraction by Multidimensional Morphological Operations [J]. IEEE Transaction on Geoseienee and Remote Sensing(S0196-2892), 2002, 40(J): 2025-2041.
  • 10Miao L, Qi H. Endmember extraction from highly mixed data using minmum volume constrained nonnegative matrix factorization [J]. IEEE Transaction on Geoseienee and Remote Senslng(S0196-2892), 2007, 45(3): 765-777.

同被引文献31

  • 1张振跃,查宏远.Principal Manifolds and Nonlinear Dimensionality Reduction via Tangent Space Alignment[J].Journal of Shanghai University(English Edition),2004,8(4):406-424. 被引量:80
  • 2Keshawl N. Mustard J F. Spectral unmixing[J]. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 2002 ; 19 ( 1 ) : 44-57.
  • 3Plaza A, Martinez R, Perez R, et al. A quantitative and comparative analysis of endmember extraction algorithms from hyperspeetral da- ta[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing,2004,42(3):650-663.
  • 4Neville R A, Staenz K, Szeredi T, et al. Automatic endmember extraction from hyperspectral data for mineral exploration[C]. Proc 21st Canadian Symposium Remote Sensing,Ottawa, 1999.
  • 5Jia S, Qian Y. Constrained nonnegalive matrix factorization for hyperspectral unmixing[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Re- mote Sensing,2009,47(1) : 161-173.
  • 6Bioucas-Dias J M, Plaza A, Dobigeon N, et al. Hyperspectral unmixing overview: geometrical, statistical, and sparse regression-based approaches[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing, 2012,5 (2) :354-379.
  • 7Bachmann C M, Ainsworth T L, Fusina R A. Exploiting manifold geometry in hyperspectral imagery[J]. IEEE Transactions on Geosci- ence and Remote Sensing,2005,43(3) :441-454.
  • 8Chen Y, Crawford M M, Ghosh J. Improved nonlinear manifold learning for land cover classification via intelligent landmark selection[C].IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium,Denver,2006.
  • 9Ma L, Crawford M M, Tian J. Anomaly detection for hyperspectral images based on robust locally linear embedding[J]. Journal of In frared, Millimeter, and Terahertz Waves, 2010,31(6) : 753-762.
  • 10Heylen R, Burazerovic D. Scheunders P. Non-linear spectral unmixing by geodesic simplex volume maximization[J]. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing, 2011,5 (3) : 534-542.

引证文献3

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部