摘要
如何对待东西文化与新旧思想,是中国要实现近代转型不得不解决的问题。五四时期,在思考中国文化出路的问题上,东西文化与新旧思想时常纠缠交结在一起,由此引起了思想界调和与激进文化观的相互论争。以陈独秀为代表的激进论者认为,东西文明之间是优劣之别,是新旧之差,"断然不能相容",要迎新则必舍旧。而以杜亚泉为代表的调和论者则认为,新旧"不过一程度问题",可以调和。激进论和调和论各有利弊缺失,但都是一代知识分子为实现近代文化转型的努力,功绩不可抹煞。
How to treat the eastern and western cultures, how to treat the new and old thoughts are problems that China has to solve in the transition from tradition to modernization. In the May Fourth period, the eastern and western cultures and the new and old thoughts were often entangled with a knot together in issues about Chinese culture＇s way out. Therefore, this resulted in mutual controversy of concept of reconciliation and radical culture in intellectual. Chen Duxiu, the radical critics＇ representative, had suggested that the difference of eastern and western civilizations was that of the pros and the cons, disparity of the old and the new, and they were ＂absolutely incompatible＂. He suggested that welcoming the new means abandoning the old. However, Du Yaquan, the reconciliation critics＇ representative, had said that the old and new civilizations were just ＂but a matter of degree＂. They could be reconciled. Both the radical critics and the reconciliation critics have their advantages and disadvantages. They are both the results of the intellectuals＇ effort to achieve the transformation of modern cultures and their merits can not be denied.
出处
《教育文化论坛》
2012年第6期66-70,共5页
Tribune of Education Culture
关键词
激进论
调和论
文化建设方案
syncretism
radical
culture - building project
