期刊文献+

去腐生肌中药治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期压疮效果的Meta分析 被引量:4

Effect of traditional Chinese medicine which eliminating necrotic tissues and promoting granulation on pressure ulcer of m to IVstage: a Meta analysis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的运用Meta分析评价去腐生肌中药治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期压疮的疗效。方法纳入去腐生肌中药治疗Ⅲ-Ⅳ期压疮的随机对照实验(RCT)的研究结果,对照组采用传统方法治疗,实验组采用去腐生肌中药治疗。由2名评价员独立筛查文献,进行质量评价和资料提取。使用Cochrance协作网提供的RevMan5.1软件进行Meta分析。结果Meta分析结果显示,实验组治愈率高于对照组,治愈时间短于对照组,实验组换药次数少于对照组。结论去腐生肌中药能显著提高Ⅲ~Ⅳ期压疮治愈率、缩短治疗时间、减少换药次数。 Objective To evaluate the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine which eliminating necrot- ic tissues and promoting granulation on pressure ulcer of Ⅲ to Ⅳ stage using Meta analysis. Methods RCT studies of therapy of eliminating necrotic tissues and promoting granulation traditional Chinese medicine for stage Ⅲ-Ⅳ pressure ulcer were searched,in which the control groups used routine methods, while the ex- perimental groups adopted necrotic tissues and promoting granulation traditional Chinese medicine. Two re- viewers assessed the documents'quality separately and completed data extraction. The statistical analysis was performed using the Cochrance collaborations' Rev Man 5.1 software. Results The cure rates for pressure ulcers of the experimental groups were higher than the control groups. The time of recovery of the experimental groups were shorter than the controls. The dressing change frequency of the experimental groups was less than the controls. Conclusions Traditional Chinese medicines which eliminating necrotic tissues and promoting granulation can significantly improve the cure rate, shorten the therapeutic time and reduce the frequency of dressing change.
机构地区 合肥医学院
出处 《中国实用护理杂志》 北大核心 2012年第36期1-4,共4页 Chinese Journal of Practical Nursing
基金 贵州省科学技术基金{黔科合J字LKZ[2012]23号]
关键词 去腐生肌 中药 压疮 META分析 Eliminating necrotic tissues and promoting granulation Traditional Chinese medicine Pressure ulcer Meta analysis Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献22

共引文献49

同被引文献82

  • 1袁浩斌,钱晓路,张美娟.盆底肌锻炼治疗压力性尿失禁效果的汇总分析[J].中华护理杂志,2004,39(3):171-173. 被引量:59
  • 2陆梅.50例Ⅲ、Ⅳ度压疮治愈的护理体会[J].临床护理杂志,2005,4(2):65-65. 被引量:6
  • 3董亦明,宋一同.软组织损伤学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,1988:5-6.
  • 4李小寒,尚少梅.基础护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2006.6.
  • 5Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, et al. North of England evidence based guidelines development project: methods of guideline development[J]. BMJ, 1996,312(7033). 760- 762.
  • 6Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred repor ring items for systematic reviews and recta-analyses: the PRISMA statement [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2009, 151 (339) :264 269.
  • 7Kung J, Cajulis O O, Avezova R, eta|. Open access from systematic reviews to clinical recommendations for evi- dence-based health care: validation of revised assessment of multiple systematic reviews (RAMSTAR) for grading of clinical relevance[J]. Open Dent J, 2010,4 : 84-91.
  • 8Bagshaw S M, McAlister F A, Manns B J, et al. Acetyl- cysteine in the prevention of contrast-induced nephropa- thy a case study of the pital!.s in the evo!.ution of evi- denee[J]. Arch Intern Med,2006,166(2) :16l 166.
  • 9Biondi Zoccai G G, Lotrionte M, Abbate A, et al. Com- pliance with QUOROM and quality of reporting of over- lapping meta-analyses on the role of acetylcysteine in the prevention of contrast associated nephropathy=case study [J]. BMJ,2006,332(7535) :202 209.
  • 10Oxman A D, Schunemann H J, Frethein A. Improving the use of research evidence in guideline development, synthesis and presentation of evidence[J]. Health Res Policy Syst,2006,4:20-30.

引证文献4

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部