期刊文献+

分次介入治疗策略在多支血管病变中的应用进展

暂未订购
导出
摘要 多支血管病变(多支病变)的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)极富挑战性,其复杂程度和手术风险远高于单支病变,血运重建策略的选择也存有争议。研究表明,与不完全性血运重建相比,完全性血运重建显著提高多支病变患者的预后,是介入治疗的首选策略[1]。但对于完全性血运重建,是选择一次性PCI还是分次PCI则一直是争论的焦点。
出处 《中国介入心脏病学杂志》 2012年第5期286-287,共2页 Chinese Journal of Interventional Cardiology
基金 哈尔滨市科技攻关计划项目(2007AA3CS082)
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, et al. Incompleterevascularization in the era of drug-eluting stents : impact onadverse outcomes. JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2009,2 : 17-25.
  • 2Widimsky P, Holmes DR Jr. How to treat patients with ST-elevation acute myocardial infarction and multi-vessel disease?Eur Heart J, 2011,32: 396-403.
  • 3Alfonso F. Multivessel intervention during primary angioplasty :too greedy? JACC Cardiovasc Interv, 2010, 3 : 32-34.
  • 4Hannan EL, Samadashvili Z,Walford G, et al. Culprit vesselpercutaneous coronary intervention versus multivessel and stagedcoronary intervention for ST-segment elevation myocardialinfarction patients with multivessel disease. J Am Coll CardiolIntv, 2010, 3: 22-31.
  • 5Vlaar PJ,Mahmoud KD, Holmes DR Jr, et al. Culprit vesselonly versus multivessel and staged percutaneous coronaryintervention for multivessel disease in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction : a pairwise and networkmeta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011, 58: 692-703.
  • 6Komowski R,Mehran R, Dangas G, et al. Prognostic impact ofstaged versus "one-time" multivessel percutaneous intervention inacute myocardial infarction : analysis from the HORIZONS-AMI(harmonizing outcomes with revascularization and stents in acutemyocardial infarction) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol, 2011,58: 704-711.
  • 7Sakakura K, Ako J, Wada H, et al. Comparison of the resourceutilization between simultaneous strategy and staged strategy totreat two-vessel coronary artery disease by percutaneous coronaryintervention. J Invasive Cardiol, 2011,23: 454-459.
  • 8Levine GN, Bates ER, Blankenship JC, et al. 2011 ACCF/AHA/SCAI Guideline for Percutaneous Coronary Intervention : areport of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelinesand the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions.Circulation, 2011, 124 : e574-e651.
  • 9Kushner FG, Hand M,Smith SC Jr, et al. 2009 focusedupdates : ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patientswith ST-elevation myocardial infarction ( updating the 2004guideline and 2007 focused update ) and ACC/AHA/SCAIguidelines on percutaneous coronary intervention ( updating the2005 guideline and 2007 focused update ) a report of theAmerican College of Cardiology Foundation/American HeartAssociation Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am CollCardiol, 2009, 54: 2205-2241.
  • 10Van de Werf F,Bax J, Betriu A, et al. Management of acutemyocardial infarction in patients presenting with persistent ST-segment elevation : the Task Force on the Management of ST-Segment Elevation Acute Myocardial Infarction of the EuropeanSociety of Cardiology. Eur Heart J, 2008, 29 : 2909-2945.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部