期刊文献+

构建我国刑事诉讼中的刑事处罚令程序——以简易程序实现方式的多元化为视角 被引量:2

On Constructing the Penal Order in Chinese Criminal Procedure——Viewed from the Diversity Realizing the Summary Procedure
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 刑事处罚令程序是由法官通过书面审以签发刑事处罚令的方式处理轻微刑事案件,对提高诉讼效率,优化司法资源配置、保障当事人合法权益意义重大,也是简易程序实现方式多元化最为有益的方式之一。我国客观真实主义的传统、书面审经验的丰富、量刑建议的规范化、辩护制度的完善均为刑事处罚令程序的构建提供了较为成熟实践经验与制度环境。我国刑事处罚令程序具体构建的思路是:案件范围限定为判处缓刑、拘役、管制或者罚金的轻微刑事案件为益;启动权应该交给检察机关,法院具有决定权,被告人具有程序否决权;具体审判组织是基层法官独立审判,辅助以有经验的人民陪审员或书记员代为负责前期的审查;在程序救济上,保障当事人的知悉、辩护权和否决权,尤其是对被告人判处人身自由刑的时候,更应当及时有效地保障其获得律师辩护人的帮助。 The penal order procedure is that the judge issues the punishment by reviewing the writings to deal with the minor eriminal cases, which is helpful to improve the efficiency, optimize the judicial resources and ensure the parties' legal rights, and as the most beneficial methods to diversify the summary procedure. There are natural practical experience and system environment to construct penal order, such as the tradition of objective truth, the rich experience of judge's reviewing writings, the standardization of the sentencing reeommendation, the improvement of the defenee system. There are many ideas to construct penal order procedure in Chinese criminal procedure as followings: the scope of the criminal cases should be limited to the probation, detention, public surveillance or fine; the starting rights should belong to the procuratorial organs, and courts have the power to decide whether to use it, and the defendants have the right to deny the use of the procedure ; the trial organization is the district independent judge, added by experienced people ' s assessors or clerks to review the minor criminal cases before; the procedural relief should protect the defendant's rights of knowing, the defender for help and the right to veto, especially the sentencing of the freedom penalty should guarantee the defendant to get the lawyer' s help timely and effectively.
作者 陈在上
出处 《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》 2012年第6期77-81,共5页 Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
基金 国家社会科学基金一般项目"轻微刑事案件快速办理机制研究" 项目批准号:08BFX073
关键词 刑事处罚令 轻微刑事案件 构建 penal order minor criminal cases construction
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1朗胜,主编.刑事诉讼法修改与使用[M].北京:新华出版社,2012:372.
  • 2马贵翔,胡铭.正当程序与刑事诉讼的现代化[M].北京:中国检察出版社,2007:218.
  • 3叶肖华.处罚令程序的比较与借鉴[J].苏州大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2010,31(2):41-45. 被引量:21
  • 4[德]托马斯·魏根特.德国刑事诉讼程序[M].岳礼玲.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
  • 5[日]谷口安平.王亚新,刘荣军译.程序的正义与诉讼[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1996.45-46.
  • 6[德]德肖维茨.最好的辩护[M].唐交东,译.北京:法律出版社.1995:482.

二级参考文献11

  • 1刘星.从量刑建议权的价值取向谈如何开展量刑建议改革[J].法学杂志,2006,27(2):113-116. 被引量:28
  • 2林钰雄.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2005.226.
  • 3弗洛伊德·菲尼,约阿希姆·赫尔曼,岳礼玲.一个案例两种制度--美德刑事司法比较[M].郭志媛译.北京:中国法制出版社,2006.
  • 4勒内·达维德.当代主要法律体系[M].漆竹生译.上海:译文出版社,1984.
  • 5松尾浩也.日本刑事诉讼法(下卷)[M].张凌译.北京:法律出版社,2005.
  • 6陈健民.刑事诉讼法要论[M].台北:政策研究基金会,2004.
  • 7Joachim Herrmann, Bargaining Justice A Bargain for German Criminal Justice .9 U.PITT.L.REV.755 ( 1992 ).
  • 8中国法律年鉴编辑部.中国法律年鉴[M].北京:中国法律年鉴出版社,2008.
  • 9陈菲.我国律师队伍发展到14.3万多人[EB/OL].中国法院网http://www.chinacourt.org/html/article/200804/15/296725shtml.
  • 10克劳思·罗科信.刑事诉讼法[M].北京:法律出版社,2003..

共引文献190

同被引文献5

引证文献2

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部