期刊文献+

城市居民对低碳农产品支付意愿与动机研究 被引量:27

China Urban Resident's Motives of Willingness to Pay for Low-carbon Agricultural Products
在线阅读 下载PDF
导出
摘要 与普通农产品相比较,低碳农产品生产所增加的成本如何合理分担是我国建设低碳农业体系中的核心问题。而消费者对低碳农产品生产成本增加所形成的额外价格的支付意愿与支付动机又是解决这一核心问题的基础。本文基于条件价值评估法(CVM)与对照法,通过对天津、山东和江苏等地的调查,以猪肉为例探究了消费者对食品低碳属性的支付意愿水平,并重点评估了消费者对食品低碳属性的支付意愿是源自利己动机还是利他动机?研究结果表明,我国城市消费者愿意为猪肉低碳属性的平均支付意愿为3.87元/斤;如果消费者事先获知低碳食品并不意味着更高的营养价值或安全属性的信息,将会显著降低他们的支付意愿。也就是说消费者为食品低碳属性支付溢价的动机来源于利他和利己动机两部分,如果消费者确信消费低碳食品只对环境有利而没有增加自身的效用,会显著地降低支付意愿。 Compared with conventional food production, low-carbon agricultural food production increases costs. Consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) is a critical part of the low-carbon economy, which will affect the compensation of the increasing production costs brought by the low-carbon production practices. Using the contingent valuation method (CVM) and the comparative method, this paper explores China' s urban households ' willingness to pay (WTP) for CO2 emission reductions resulted from changes in food production processes. A survey of 417 respondents was conducted in the urban areas of Tianjin, Shandong and Jiangsu. With an incentive compatible and comparative method, the study finds that the average premium for the low-carbon attributes is RMB3.87 per 500 kg for pork. The study also examines the impacts of different information treatments on the price premium for the lowcarbon attributes in order to explore consumers' motivations. The study shows that the alternative information treatments affect consumers ' WTP, suggesting that consumers' WTP for the lowcarbon food is partly derived from perceived selfish attributes.
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第11期165-171,共7页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 国家社会科学基金重大招标项目"建设以低碳排放为特征的农业产业体系和农产品消费模式研究"(编号:10zd&031) 江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划项目(编号:CXZZ12_0301)
关键词 温室效用 低碳农产品 对照法 支付意愿 支付动机 greenhouse effect low-carbon food willingness to pay comparative method motives for buying
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

二级参考文献46

  • 1曾贤刚,庞含霜.我国各省区CO_2排放状况、趋势及其减排对策[J].中国软科学,2009(S1):64-70. 被引量:39
  • 2张茵,蔡运龙.条件估值法评估环境资源价值的研究进展[J].北京大学学报(自然科学版),2005,41(2):317-328. 被引量:131
  • 3梁勇,成升魁,闵庆文,马冬梅.居民对改善城市水环境支付意愿的研究[J].水利学报,2005,36(5):613-617. 被引量:45
  • 4杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 5Carson R T, Mitchell R C, Hanemann M, et al. Contingent Valuation and lost Passive Use: Damages from the Exxon Valdez oil spill [J]. Environmental and Resource Economics, 2003,25: 257-286.
  • 6Carson R T, Hanemann W. Contingent valuation-handbook of environment economics [M]. M. Elsevier, 2005:824-826.
  • 7Lee J J, Cameron T A. Popular Support for Climate Change Mitigation: Evidence from a General Population Mail Survey [J]. Environ. Resource Econ., 2008,41:223-248.
  • 8Viseusi W K, Zeckhauser R J. The perception and valuation of the risks of climate change: a rational and behavioral blend [J]. Climatic Change, 2006,77:151 - 177.
  • 9Burghart D R, Cameron T A, Gerdes G R. Valuing publicly sponsored research projects: risks, scenario adjustments, and inattention [J]. Journal of Risk Uncertainty, 2007,35:77-105.
  • 10Cameron T A, Crawford G D. Independent dimensions of sociodemographic variability in neighborhood characteristics at the tract level of the 2000 census [R]. Eugene, OR: Department of Economics, University of Oregon, 2003:35.

共引文献165

同被引文献392

引证文献27

二级引证文献254

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部